PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology142 citations

Select Drug-Drug Interactions With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

View Full Paper
BWBarbara S. WigginsDDDave L. DixonRNRon Neyens

Key Result

Drug-drug interactions involving direct oral anticoagulants represent an important contributor to increased bleeding risk, requiring awareness to optimize management and mitigate bleeding.

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the impact of drug-drug interactions on the management of direct oral anticoagulants.
  • Overview of DOAC metabolism and common drug interactions
  • Discussion of mechanisms leading to drug-drug interactions
  • Strategies for mitigating bleeding risk associated with these interactions
  • Identified major drug-drug interactions that increase bleeding risk in patients using DOACs.
  • Explained the underlying mechanisms contributing to these interactions.
  • Provided recommendations for management to optimize therapy and reduce bleeding risks.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Individuals requiring long-term treatment with an oral anticoagulant
I
Intervention
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)

Understanding DOAC metabolism and drug-drug interactions is essential for optimizing anticoagulant therapy and minimizing bleeding risks.

Abstract

Millions of individuals in the United States require long-term treatment with an oral anticoagulant. For decades, vitamin K antagonists were the only oral option available; however, they have a number of well-known limitations. Introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has long been considered a major therapeutic advance, largely because they lack the need for therapeutic monitoring. Despite this, DOACs, like vitamin K antagonists, can still cause major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, even when used appropriately. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving the DOACs represent an important contributor to increased bleeding risk. Awareness of these DDIs and how best to address them is of critical importance in optimizing management while mitigating bleeding risk. This review provides an overview of DOAC metabolism, the most common drugs likely to contribute to DOAC DDIs, their underlying mechanisms, and how best to address them.

Expert Takes1 quote

“Hi. I'm Michael Field. I'm a clinical cardiac electrophysiologist in Charleston, South Carolina.”

Michael E. Field, Clinical cardiac electrophysiologist, Charleston, South CarolinaMedical University of South Carolinaauto_pipelineNeutralView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wiggins et al. (2020) conducted a review in Patients requiring oral anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was evaluated. Drug-drug interactions involving direct oral anticoagulants represent an important contributor to increased bleeding risk, requiring awareness to optimize management and mitigate bleeding.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb3585bd73c2fec3bb0c28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies2011 · 762 citations
  2. 2Rivaroxaban With and Without Amiodarone in Renal Impairment2018 · 36 citations
  3. 3Comparison of the Novel Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban in the Initial and Long-Term Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis2015 · 201 citations
  4. 4Effectiveness and Safety of Non–vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses2017 · 174 citations
  5. 5Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials2012 · 137 citations