PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Energy Science & Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Overcurrent Protection in Smart Grids Under Cyber‐Physical Threats With a Cyber‐Physical Evaluation Framework

View Full Paper
FAFeras AlasaliAAAnas AlMajaliNNNaser Naily

Key Points

  • The paper aims to evaluate overcurrent protection vulnerabilities in smart grids due to cyber-physical threats.
  • Used attack-tree structure to assess cyber threats and their effects on overcurrent protection.
  • Modeled cyber disturbances with OMNeT and physical interactions with ETAP for co-simulation of events.
  • Applied framework to the IEEE 9-bus network under various cyberattack scenarios.
  • Identified critical system weaknesses that can lead to misoperations during malicious attacks.
  • Demonstrated how specific attack configurations impact fault detection and relay coordination.
  • Highlighted the need for enhanced resilience in power protection systems.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The transition toward cyber‐physical smart grids has improved operational flexibility and enabled the wide integration of distributed generation, while also introducing new cyber‐induced vulnerabilities. Increasing reliance on communication networks, particularly within protection schemes, creates additional risks of coordinated cyber‐physical attacks that may compromise relay decisions and system stability. This paper provides a focused technical assessment of these risks and introduces an evaluation framework to analyse overcurrent protection under cyber interference. The approach employs an attack‐tree structure to characterise cyber‐physical paths and their propagation to the protection layer. Communication‐side disturbances are modelled using OMNeT, while ETAP is used to represent the physical network and relay coordination environment, allowing co‐simulation of cyber events and electrical responses. By examining the interaction between the cyber and physical domains, the framework shows how specific attack configurations affect fault detection, relay timing, and coordination margins. The results highlight key system weaknesses, identify conditions that could cause misoperations, and point to areas where additional resilience measures are required. This work introduces a step‐by‐step evaluation process using the IEEE 9‐bus network under different cyberattack scenarios, including blocking relay commands, changing relay configurations, and injecting false data. The results present the effects of these attacks on the power protection system's sensitivity and selectivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alasali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b6088ba6daa22dace97https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70531
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Intrusion Detection System for IEC61850 Automated Substations2010 · 158 citations
  2. 2Cybersecurity in Power Grids: Challenges and Opportunities2021 · 194 citations
  3. 3Harnessing Artificial Intelligence Capabilities to Improve Cybersecurity2020 · 319 citations
  4. 4Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities2020 · 173 citations
  5. 5Modelling Cyber Attacks on Electricity Market Using Mathematical Programming With Equilibrium Constraints2019 · 27 citations