Metagenomic Profiling Reveals Extensive Bacterial Diversity in Chicken Manure and Associated Contaminated Wastewater

Chicken manure and its potential to contaminate water systems through the dispersal of pathogenic bacteria are major concerns in environmental and public health. In this study, a metagenomic analysis was employed to systematically identify and compare bacterial assemblages in chicken manure (CM) and in a contaminated sample of chicken manure wastewater (CMW). Whole DNA was extracted from CM and CMW, followed by whole-genome shotgun sequencing; data analysis was done using online Galaxy software (ver. 26.0.1.dev1). Metagenomic analysis reveals a complex One Health challenge. Data showed that CM and CMW are different in their microbiota, as indicated by a distinct separation of beta diversity values and limited overlapping of species between sample types. In the current study, we found a greatly significant common functional set of adapted bacterial masses, including major pathogenic bacterial groups as well as opportunistic and environmental bacterial species, indicative of a direct contamination from CM and CMW. Notably, in both CM and CMW, a plethora of opportunistic, enteric, and environmental pathogens like Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Acinetobacter baumannii were found, coupled with an indication of a direct functional flow between both ecosystems as tangled reservoirs. Chicken manure samples showed differences in taxonomic composition and inferred functional profiles at the time of sampling: CM1 was pathogen-enriched, CM2 exhibited strong nitrogen-supportive metabolism, CM3 was dominated by fiber-degrading decomposers, and CM4 showed high methane-producing potential with environmental risk. Such findings underscore the raising of chickens as a potential source of harmful bacteria for the environment. It is important to note that this study represents a preliminary investigation with certain limitations, including the absence of biological replicates, lack of temporal sampling, and limited capacity to infer dynamic ecological interactions. Yet this metagenomic report is more about describing the taxonomy and functional potential of the bacteria, rather than discussing the actual ecological processes of these microorganisms in the environment. Future studies will be required to explore these aspects.