PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026Journal of Environmental Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of the School Contexts of Outdoor Learning (SCOOL) scale

View Full Paper
NPNicola ParkinKHKersty HobsonWPWouter Poortinga

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and validate the School Contexts of Outdoor Learning (SCOOL) scale to assess factors influencing outdoor learning.
  • Used a sequential mixed-methods approach involving five studies and 862 teachers across the UK.
  • Conducted interviews and surveys to identify constructs and validate the scale's effectiveness.
  • Assessed reliability and validity through national surveys and expert reviews.
  • SCOOL is a valid and reliable instrument with high reliability (α=0.91).
  • The scale effectively measures multi-level barriers to outdoor learning, providing practical utility for schools.
  • Confirmed criterion validity linked with nature connection and autonomy.

Abstract

Time in nature has well-documented benefits for children’s health, wellbeing, and cognitive and social development. Schools have the potential to offer equitable access to nature through outdoor learning, yet the roles of teachers in facilitating outdoor learning remains under-researched. This study used a sequential mixed-methods approach to develop and validate the School Contexts of Outdoor Learning (SCOOL) scale, based on an ecological model of outdoor learning. SCOOL aims to capture enablers and barriers to outdoor learning at three levels: the individual teacher, the school environment, and national educational context. The scale development process followed the steps outlined by DeVellis and Thorpe (2021) and involved five consecutive studies. In-depth interviews with teachers (n = 25) participating in a nature connection programme were used to define key constructs (Study 1). This was followed by a short online survey with teachers (n = 125) to support item generation (Study 2i), cognitive interviews with ten teachers to test item clarity and comprehension (Study 2ii), and a review by an expert panel (n = 8) comprising academics, practitioners and third-sector representatives (Study 2iii). A final national survey with teachers across the UK (n = 516) was used to confirm the scale structure and assess its reliability and validity (Study 3). The findings demonstrate that SCOOL is a valid and reliable instrument with practical utility for evaluating and supporting outdoor learning in schools. • We constructed the SCOOL scale for measuring teachers’ outdoor learning capability • The 18-item scale covers individual, school, and national educational contexts • Five studies with 862 UK teachers ensured robust psychometric properties • High reliability (α=.91) and criterion validity with nature connection and autonomy • First tool to quantify multi-level barriers to outdoor learning in schools.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parkin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04e08727298f751e7204fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper