PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Otolaryngology0 citations

Barriers and Facilitators to Parental Shared Decision Making for Adenotonsillectomy and Tympanostomy Tube Placement

View Full Paper
ELErin LutherPHPaul HongUKUsman Khan

Key Points

  • To identify barriers and facilitators to parental involvement in shared decision making for adenotonsillectomy and tympanostomy tube surgeries.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with parents attending surgical consultations.
  • Analyzed data using the Theoretical Domains Framework to evaluate behavioral determinants.
  • Reviewed thematic coding by two separate reviewers.
  • Eleven interviews were completed, achieving data saturation.
  • Four meta-themes emerged influencing parental participation in shared decision making: adequate information, time for discussion, surgeon demeanor, and comfort in decision-making.
  • Parents acknowledge shared decision making as ideal but vary in their preferred role and awareness of options.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to parents' participation in shared decision making (SDM) for adenotonsillectomy or tympanostomy tube surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study. SETTING: Semi-structured interviews with parents who had attended a surgical consultation to discuss adeno/tonsillectomy or tympanostomy tube placement for their child. METHODS: Data were analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify behavioural determinants related to parents' capability, opportunity, and motivation for engaging in SDM. Thematic coding of interviews was performed by 2 separate reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 11 interviews were conducted. Data saturation was confirmed following thematic analysis. Themes were grouped into 4 meta-themes identifying dominant factors shaping parents' participation in SDM: (1) Having adequate information about the condition and available options, (2) Having time to consider and discuss the decision beyond the initial consultation, (3) The demeanor of the surgeon, and (4) Comfort participating in decision-making. CONCLUSION: Parents agree that SDM is a good ideal for guiding consultations about adeno/tonsillectomy or tympanostomy tube surgery, but not all parents prefer the same role in decision-making. Parents are not equally aware of treatment options before or after attending a consultation, and their comfort discussing options is impacted by surgeons' behaviour. Design of SDM supports for this clinical context would beneficially include provision of information before the consultation, tools to support explicit and supportive conversation about parents' preferences and treatment options, and clinical infrastructure for continued communication and emotional support after the consultation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luther et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c718b49bacb8b347efchttps://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.70267
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Otolaryngology: A Qualitative Study2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2How to discuss transferability of qualitative research in health professions education2024 · 113 citations
  3. 3Measurement challenges in shared decision making: putting the ‘patient’ in patient‐reported measures2015 · 78 citations
  4. 4The Role of Patients2017 · 60 citations
  5. 5The Evolving Role of the Nurse During the Cancer Treatment Decision-Making Process: A Literature Review2015 · 87 citations