Objectives: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, primarily due to irreversible cardiomyocyte injury and minimal regenerative potential. While mesenchymal and bone-marrow-derived stem cells have been widely studied, evidence for cardiac stem cells (CSCs) remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the ef cacy of cardiac stem cell therapy after MI. Methods: We conducted this meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies were identi ed from electronic searches of PubMed, EBSCO, and ProQuest for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the ef cacy of cardiac stem cell therapy after MI. The random effect analysis was performed using R v4.4.1. Results: Four randomized controlled trials comprising 329 participants were included. At six months, cardiac stem cell therapy was associated with a signi cant reduction in scar mass (MD: -4.25 g, 95% CI: -7.16 to -1.34, p = 0.004) and infarct size (MD: -2.32%, 95% CI: -3.91 to -0.73, p = 0.004) compared with placebo. No signi cant differences were observed in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) at either six or twelve months, or in the 6-minute walk test at 12 months. Conclusion: Cardiac stem cell therapy after MI is associated with modest reductions in scar mass and infarct size at six months, without signi cant improvement in global ventricular function or functional capacity up to twelve months. These ndings suggest that while CSCs may confer early structural bene ts, their clinical impact remains uncertain and requires con rmation in larger trials with longer follow-up.
Jusni et al. (2026) studied this question.