PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Frontiers in Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

The relationship between patterns of artificial intelligence use, academic resilience, and burnout among graduate students in special education departments at Saudi universities

REReda Ebrahim Mohamed ElashramLALiyla Alamri

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the relationships among artificial intelligence usage, academic resilience, and burnout in graduate students.
  • Cross-sectional correlational descriptive design conducted with 367 graduate students.
  • Data collected using Maslach Burnout Inventory, Brief Resilience Scale, and AI application usage patterns scale.
  • Statistical analysis determined correlations and predictive capacity among variables.
  • Low AI application use (mean not specified) and academic resilience observed, contrasting with high burnout levels (mean not specified).
  • Negative correlation between AI usage patterns and burnout (r = -0.541, p < 0.001).
  • AI application usage patterns accounted for 34.1% variance in burnout (R² = 0.341, large effect size).

Abstract

Introduction Higher education institutions face increasing challenges in maintaining the psychological well-being of graduate students amid intensive academic pressures and rapid digital transformation. This study investigated the relationships between patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) application use, academic resilience, and burnout among graduate students in special education departments at Saudi universities, and determined the predictive capacity of these variables for burnout. Methods A cross-sectional correlational descriptive design was employed. Data were collected from 367 graduate students (207 males, 160 females) using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-SS), the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and a developed scale for AI application usage patterns. Results Results revealed low levels of AI application use and academic resilience, in contrast to high levels of burnout. Significant negative correlations were found between AI usage patterns and burtenout ( r = −0.541, p 0.001), and between academic resilience and burnout ( r = −0.437, p 0.001). AI application usage patterns explained 34.1% of the variance in burnout ( R 2 = 0.341, f 2 = 0.52, a large effect size), while academic resilience explained 19.1% ( R 2 = 0.191, f 2 = 0.24, medium effect). Discussion These findings highlight the potential of technological competence as a psychological resource associated with reduced burnout. Structured AI training programs, institutional resilience interventions, and optimized research workloads are recommended in alignment with Saudi Vision 2030.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elashram et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7cd4bfa21ec5bbf05c27https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1776966
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper