PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Results in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

GIS-Based Risk- and Policy-Aware Optimization of a Sustainable End-of-Life EV Battery Reverse Logistics Network in Northwest Syria

View Full Paper
JHJamil Hallak

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a risk- and policy-aware optimization model for EV battery reverse logistics in a conflict-affected area.
  • Applied a GIS- and expert-risk-aware mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) framework for a four-level logistics network.
  • Evaluated carbon policies through scenario optimization while balancing cost, CO₂ emissions, and two risk dimensions.
  • Conducted sensitivity tests on a 39–14–5–3 network structure to assess stability of facility selections.
  • Achieved 101% of the environmental-risk target and 111% of the operational-risk target under the optimized model.
  • Total cost resulted at 128% and CO₂ emissions at 147% of their aspiration levels.
  • Site selection variability across different preference structures indicated stability in the echelon design.

Abstract

• GIS- and expert-risk-aware MILP for 4-level EV battery reverse logistics in Idlib. • Operational (GIS) and environmental (expert) risks are optimized as separate goals. • Fuzzy-FUCOM weights and goal programming balance cost, CO₂, and risk trade-offs. • Carbon policies (tax, subsidy, cap-and-trade) evaluated via scenario optimization. • Facility selections remain stable for the 39–14–5–3 network under sensitivity tests. This paper develops a policy- and risk-aware MILP for designing a four-level reverse logistics network for end-of-life EV/HV batteries in Idlib city, northwest Syria, a conflict-affected setting where formal datasets are limited and must be supported by field collection and expert elicitation. The contribution is to embed two distinct risk dimensions directly in the optimization—a GIS-derived operational risk and an expert-derived environmental vulnerability risk—kept separate to reflect different mechanisms of disruption and harm. Goal importance is derived using fuzzy-FUCOM, and the network is solved via non-preemptive weighted goal programming over four goals: total cost, CO₂, operational risk, and environmental risk, under carbon-policy scenarios including tax, subsidy, and cap-and-trade. Using a 39–14–5–3 candidate structure, the compromise solution attains 101% of the environmental-risk target and 111% of the operational-risk target, with cost at 128% and CO₂ at 147% of their aspiration levels, while the echelon structure remains stable across weight-sensitivity profiles, although exact site selection varies under some preference structures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jamil Hallak (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ddcbfa21ec5bbf061f0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110835
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper