PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Muscle Preservation after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Approaches

View Full Paper
OTOnishi TatsukiYOYoshika OnishiTITatsuyoshi Ikenoue

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare muscle preservation outcomes between endovascular and open surgical approaches in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
  • Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (30 EVAR, 20 OAS) undergoing elective AAA repair at a single center from 2012 to 2014.
  • Primary endpoint was the change in rectus femoris short-axis diameter measured by computed tomography at 3–6 months post-surgery.
  • Matched treatment groups using propensity score matching to create 30 pairs for valid comparison.
  • After matching, EVAR resulted in a significant preservation of rectus femoris muscle compared to OAS (DiD 17.25 mm²; 95% CI 2.54–31.97; P = 0.02).

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Older patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are at risk of functional decline. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has better perioperative outcomes than open abdominal surgery (OAS), but its impact on postoperative muscle preservation is unclear. We compared rectus femoris muscle changes after EVAR versus OAS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients undergoing elective AAA repair (EVAR n = 30; OAS n = 20) at a single center (2012–2014). The primary endpoint was the pre- to postoperative change in the bilateral rectus femoris short-axis diameter product on computed tomography (mm 2 ) at the level of the pubic symphysis 3–6 months after surgery. Baseline and follow-up rectus femoris values were 1120 ± 410 versus 1132 ± 441 mm 2 (EVAR) and 791 ± 336 versus 805 ± 431 mm 2 (OAS); baseline values were lower in the OAS group. Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest-neighbor, caliper 0.05, with replacement) produced 30 matched pairs. Treatment effects were estimated using a two-time-point difference-in-differences (DiD) model; effect sizes were summarized as standardized mean differences (Cohen’s d ). Results: After matching, EVAR was associated with better preservation of the rectus femoris muscle than OAS (DiD 17.25 mm²; 95% confidence interval 2.54–31.97; P = 0.02). Conclusion: EVAR may confer advantages over OAS in preserving rectus femoris muscle mass after AAA repair, particularly in older patients at risk of postoperative functional decline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tatsuki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e5cbfa21ec5bbf0684bhttps://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_17_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper