PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Planning Theory0 citationsOpen Access

Sweet dreams. How the doughnut diagram works to preempt more radical approaches to planning

View Full Paper
KWKarin Winter

Key Points

  • This article examines the limitations of the doughnut diagram in facilitating radical planning approaches. It questions the assumed sustainability of Doughnut Economics.
  • Critical interrogation of the doughnut diagram within the context of planning discussions.
  • Analysis drawing on Lacanian psychoanalytic theory and its application to visual representations in planning.
  • The doughnut diagram constrains alternative ways of understanding and engaging with planning.
  • Conclusions suggest that doughnut planning may undermine the more ambitious goals of planners seeking significant change.

Abstract

Doughnut Economics has become an important model for planning, often assumed to offer a better, more sustainable approach. This article engages with such assumptions by critically interrogating the radical potential of doughnut planning. It does this through examining the doughnut diagram, which conceptualizes core ideas of Doughnut Economics, and by relating these to discussions in planning. The analysis draws on Lacanian thought and extends the psychoanalytic approach to include visual representations in planning. It shows that the doughnut diagram forecloses ways of seeing and enjoying that more fundamentally could challenge mainstream planning. Assuming the doughnut diagram is shaping doughnut planning, this leads to the conclusion that this planning model works against more far-reaching ambitions of some of the planners rallying around it.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karin Winter (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ee0bfa21ec5bbf0722bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/14730952261448510
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper