PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citations

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a2480 Infarct in New Territory After Endovascular Treatment: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Evt Versus Evt Alone

View Full Paper
RRRoman RohnerFCFabiano CavalcanteJLJ W Liu

Key Points

  • The aim was to evaluate if intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment reduces infarcts in new territory and assess its clinical significance.
  • Individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials comparing IVT + EVT versus EVT alone.
  • Central adjudication of imaging by trained evaluators.
  • Mixed-effects logistic regression models used for statistical analysis.
  • INT occurred in 13% of participants, with lower incidence in IVT + EVT (11%) compared to EVT alone (15%), OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.92.
  • INT was linked to worse functional outcomes at 90 days, with lower odds of improvement (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.72) and less functional independence (42% vs 52%, OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46–0.79).
  • Higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were observed in participants with INT.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims We investigated whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular treatment (EVT) reduces the occurrence of infarcts in new territory (INT) and evaluated the clinical relevance of INT. Methods Individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials comparing IVT + EVT versus EVT alone. Imaging from all trials was centrally adjudicated by trained evaluators. INT was defined as an infarct on follow-up imaging in a vascular territory not hypoperfused during acute treatment. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with study-stratified intercepts and random study effects were used to assess the association between treatment allocation and INT, and between INT, functional outcomes, and safety outcomes. Results Evaluable imaging was available for 2024/2313 (88%) participants (1010 EVT alone; 1014 IVT + EVT). INT occurred in 265 (13%) and was less frequent after IVT + EVT compared with EVT alone (113 11% vs 152 15%; OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.92). INT was associated with worse functional outcomes at 90 days, including lower odds of improved modified Rankin Scale scores (adjusted common OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.72) and lower rates of functional independence (42% vs 52%; adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46–0.79). INT was also associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions INT occurred in 13% of participants with large-vessel occlusion stroke undergoing EVT, and was associated with worse outcomes. Participants randomized to IVT + EVT had lower rates of INT, though this did not translate to improved functional outcome in our data. Conflict of interest Roman Rohner: nothing to disclose. Fabiano Cavalcante: nothing to disclose. Jianmin Liu: nothing to disclose. Yongwei Zhang: nothing to disclose. Kentaro Suzuki: nothing to disclose. Raul Nogueira: nothing to disclose. Peter Mitchell: nothing to disclose. Dr Roos reports stock holdings in Nicolab. Dr Fischer reports grants from Stryker to other; grants from Schweizerische Herzstiftung; grants from Penumbra, Inc, to other; grants from SNSF; compensation from phenox, Inc, for end point review committee services; grants from Medtronic to other; grants from phenox, Inc, to other; grants from Rapid Medical, Ltd, to other; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from Stryker to other; and grants from Medtronic to other. Dr Gralla reports compensation from Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc, for consultant services and compensation from Medtronic USA, Inc, for other services.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rohner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ee0bfa21ec5bbf073cfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.158
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2447 SUSCEPTIBILITY OR HYPERDENSE VESSEL SIGN AND INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS BEFORE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT: AN INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA META-ANALYSIS OF SIX RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS2026
  2. 2ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1329 TIME TO ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT IN MEDIUM OR DISTAL VESSEL OCCLUSION STROKE: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE DISTAL TRIAL2026
  3. 3ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1808 REVERSE CHERRY PICKING IN LARGE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS—RESULTS FROM THE DISTAL TRIAL2026
  4. 4ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1388 INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR STROKE DUE TO OCCLUSION OF MEDIUM OR DISTAL VESSELS: INSIGHTS FROM THE DISTAL TRIAL2026
  5. 5ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A888 PREDICTORS OF FUTILE RECANALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE AND LARGE INFARCT: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE TENSION TRIAL2026