PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citations

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a327 Neural Substrates Underlying Impaired Proximal and Distal Bimanual Motor Control and Bimanual Coordination in Acute Stroke

View Full Paper
YVYves VandermeerenLDLaurence DricotNDNicolas Delinte

Key Points

  • To explore the neural mechanisms underlying impaired bimanual coordination and motor control following acute stroke.
  • Involved 95 patients post-acute stroke and 60 healthy individuals.
  • Used REA2plan robot and Dextrain Manipulandum for motor assessments.
  • Employed multimodal MRI for identifying relevant neural substrates.
  • Proximal bimanual motor control significantly impaired (Est = –0.38 a.u., p < 0.001).
  • Distal bimanual coordination impairment noted (Est = –0.29 a.u., p = 0.005).
  • Integrity of corticospinal tract correlated with distal control (Z=4.06, p=0.05).

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Unilateral stroke often causes bimanual impairments, which are critical to address since most daily activities require bimanual coordination. We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these early poststroke deficits. Methods In 95 patients with a single acute stroke (5.8 ± 4.2 days poststroke) and 60 age-matched healthy individuals (HI), we quantified bimanual motor control and coordination in the proximal upper limb (UL) using the REA2plan robot, and in the distal UL using the Dextrain Manipulandum. Multimodal MRI was employed to identify neural substrates of these impairments. Results Compared to HI, proximal bimanual motor control was significantly impaired in patients (Est = –0.38 a.u. –0.55, –0.21, p 0.001), as was bimanual coordination (–0.144 a.u. –0.18, –0.10, p 0.001). Distally (thumb–index pinches), both motor control and coordination were impaired (–0.32 a.u. –0.44, –0.21, p 0.001; –0.29 a.u. –0.49, –0.08, p = 0.005). Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping analysis showed that lesion along the corticospinal tract (CST) correlated with impaired distal bimanual control (Z=4.05562687, uncorrected p=0.05, 21mm3, peak MNI=-24,-6,28). Region-of-Interest-based tractography demonstrated that the microstructural integrity of the CST of acute patients correlated with proximal bimanual coordination (r=-0.49; p0.001) and with distal bimanual control (r=0.3, p=0.004). Microstructural integrity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (r=-0.42; p=0.005) and the corpus callosum was related to proximal bimanual coordination (r=-0.4; p=0.004) and proximal bimanual motor control (r=-0.38; p=0.005). Conclusions Dissecting proximal and distal bimanual impairments and their neural substrates in the acute phase provides key insights for targeted neurorehabilitation. Conflict of interest N/A

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandermeeren et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07d75https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper