PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

AUGMANITAI Concept-Mining Waves 2+3 — Sport / Social-Theory / Ethics + AI-Safety Lens Reports

View Full Paper
AEAndreas Ehstand

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the intersection of sport, social theory, and ethics while integrating AI safety perspectives.
  • Analyzed 17 concept-mining reports categorized into D-cluster, E-cluster, and F-cluster.
  • Focused on neologisms and methodological transferability between sport-coaching and human-AI interaction.
  • Employed a scholarly perspective for strict-Wissenschaft interpretation.
  • Identified field-specific concepts in sport, social theory, and ethics using a systematic framework.
  • Highlighted methodological parallels between sport coaching and AI interactions.
  • Proposed new insights into ethical considerations related to AI in the context of sport and society.

Abstract

Restricted bundle of 17 concept-mining reports (Waves 2 + 3) covering: D-cluster (Sport + Tacit Knowledge + Expertise) - D31 Sportwiss, D37 Tacit, D38 Expertise, D40 Tennis-Coach; E-cluster (Social Theory) - E41 Bourdieu, E42 Luhmann, E43 Foucault, E45 Anthropologist, E46 Historian, E47 Political Theorist, E48 Geopolitik, E49 Strategic Theorist, E50 Network Theorist; F-cluster (Ethics + Safety) - F51 Ethicist Applied, F60 AI Safety; W3 follow-ups - F51 Ethicist Safety Charter, F60 AI Safety. Each lens surfaces field-specific neologisms, methodological transferability between sport-coaching and human-AI interaction, social-theoretic anchoring of AUGMANITAI categories. Strict-Wissenschaft, scholarly-perspective interpretation only.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andreas Ehstand (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fa1bfa21ec5bbf0833bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20058506
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper