PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2020Scientific Reports504 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis

CKChayakrit KrittanawongHVHafeez Ul Hassan VirkSBSripal Bangalore

Structured PICO

Do machine learning algorithms accurately predict cardiovascular diseases in patient cohorts?

P
Population
103 cohorts with a total of 3,377,318 individuals for cardiovascular disease prediction (coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias)
I
Intervention
Machine learning (ML) algorithms (including boosting, custom-built, support vector machine [SVM], and convolutional neural network [CNN])
O
Outcome
Composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias (measured by Area Under the Curve [AUC])

Machine learning algorithms, particularly support vector machines and boosting algorithms, demonstrate strong predictive ability for cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease and stroke, though significant methodological heterogeneity exists.

Limitations

  • Inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias
  • Heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters

Abstract

Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81-0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81-0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krittanawong et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0164ecda5c1eb07f2ddcfbhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72685-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting2000 · 20,895 citations
  2. 2A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection2011 · 312 citations
  3. 3SVM and SVM Ensembles in Breast Cancer Prediction2017 · 345 citations
  4. 4Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.2005 · 1,625 citations
  5. 5A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis2019 · 1,915 citations