PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology0 citations

Focal pulsed field ablation for atrial tachycardia near the phrenic nerve: a two-case experience

View Full Paper
JLJiaqi LiEGErick GodinezRDRahul Devathu

Key Result

Focal pulsed field ablation successfully terminated crista terminalis atrial tachycardia near the phrenic nerve in two patients, achieving durable sinus rhythm without long-term phrenic injury.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of focal pulsed field ablation near the phrenic nerve for atrial tachycardia.
  • Two patients underwent focal pulsed field ablation with a TactiFlex Duo catheter.
  • Ablation targeted the mid-crista terminalis in one case and the posterolateral right atrium in the other.
  • Each patient received 12 low-energy pulsed field ablation applications.
  • Case 1 achieved sinus rhythm restoration without complications and preserved phrenic nerve function.
  • Case 2 experienced transient phrenic nerve palsy that fully resolved by the end of the procedure.
  • Both cases resulted in durable sinus rhythm without long-term phrenic injury.

Study Design

Type

Case Report (n=2)

Structured PICO

Does focal pulsed field ablation safely terminate atrial tachycardia near the phrenic nerve without causing permanent phrenic injury?

P
Population
n=2 patients with symptomatic atrial tachycardia (AT) arising from the crista terminalis in close proximity to the phrenic nerve (a 76-year-old man and a 25-year-old woman)
I
Intervention
Focal pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a novel focal PFA catheter (TactiFlex Duo, Abbott), 12 applications/lesions per patient
O
Outcome
Acute termination of atrial tachycardia, restoration of sinus rhythm, and phrenic nerve injury status

Focal pulsed field ablation appears feasible for treating atrial tachycardia near the phrenic nerve, achieving acute success without permanent phrenic injury, though transient stunning may occur.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia (AT) adjacent to the phrenic nerve is limited by the risk of diaphragmatic injury with conventional energy sources. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal modality with relative tissue selectivity that may reduce collateral damage. We describe two patients with symptomatic AT arising from the crista terminalis in close proximity to the phrenic nerve who underwent ablation with a novel focal PFA catheter (TactiFlex Duo, Abbott). Case 1: A 76-year-old man with recurrent AT after incomplete prior ablation received 12 focal PFA applications at the mid-crista terminalis. Phrenic nerve capture was preserved throughout, and sinus rhythm was restored without complication. Case 2: A 25-year-old woman with symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia underwent 12 low-energy PFA lesions at the posterolateral right atrium. Transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred but fully recovered by the end of the procedure. In both cases, durable sinus rhythm was achieved without long term phrenic injury. CONCLUSION: Focal PFA enabled acute termination of crista terminalis AT in close proximity to the right phrenic nerve, including one case with preserved phrenic capture throughout and one case with reproducible transient phrenic nerve palsy after each application with full recovery. These cases support the feasibility of focal PFA in phrenic-adjacent right atrial substrates, while underscoring that phrenic nerve stunning can occur.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Atrial tachycardia adjacent to the phrenic nerve (n=2). Focal pulsed field ablation (TactiFlex Duo, Abbott) was evaluated on Acute termination of atrial tachycardia and phrenic nerve injury. Focal pulsed field ablation successfully terminated crista terminalis atrial tachycardia near the phrenic nerve in two patients, achieving durable sinus rhythm without long-term phrenic injury.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025efbc9581ed855361b26https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02326-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper