PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Family Process0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of the Individual, Relationship, and Financial Benefits of Juntos en Pareja for Spanish‐Speaking Latine Couples

View Full Paper
MFMariana K. FalconierHWHannah C. WilliamsonZAZeinab Azizi

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Juntos en Pareja program on relationship and financial outcomes for Spanish-speaking Latine couples.
  • Randomized trial comparing pre- and post-workshop outcomes in 284 Latine couples participating in JEP and 266 non-Latine couples in TOGETHER.
  • Utilized linear mixed models to assess changes in psychological well-being, relationship quality, and financial stability.
  • Analyzed data from couples residing in the United States.
  • JEP participants demonstrated significant declines in psychological distress and negative conflict management.
  • Couples in JEP reported reduced difficulty in paying bills and increased time spent with their partners.
  • Results highlight the program's potential benefits for fostering relationship and financial stability among Spanish-speaking Latine couples.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Latine couples often face high levels of financial stress, which can significantly strain romantic relationships. Yet few programs are designed to address both financial and relational distress for this population. Juntos en Pareja ( JEP ) is a socio‐culturally responsive program designed to address these challenges by providing relationship and financial education to Spanish‐speaking Latine couples. JEP is a cultural and linguistic adaptation of the evidence‐based program TOGETHER. This study evaluates JEP' s effectiveness by comparing pre‐ and post‐workshop outcomes among Latine couples in JEP with a comparison group of non‐Latine couples in the TOGETHER program. We examined three domains: psychological well‐being, relationship quality, and financial stability. The analytic sample included 284 couples (568 individuals) in JEP and 266 couples (532 individuals) in TOGETHER, all residing in the United States. Using linear mixed models, we assessed changes from pre‐ to post‐test across key indicators. Similar to TOGETHER, JEP participants showed significant declines in psychological distress, negative conflict management, and psychological aggression toward the partner and by the partner, and significant increases in time spent with the partner. Additionally, JEP couples also reported reduced difficulty in paying bills. These results provide support for JEP as a beneficial program for Spanish‐speaking Latine couples, but they should be considered with caution as they represent the experience of program completers with high attendance and immediately upon program completion. Further studies should assess the sustainability of changes over time. Nonetheless, these initial findings underscore the need for accessible, socio‐culturally attuned interventions to promote resilience and stability in underserved immigrant communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Falconier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080af2a487c87a6a40cfddhttps://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Financial Strain and Suicide Attempts in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults2020 · 176 citations
  2. 2Insufficient Sleep and Poor Sleep Quality Completely Mediate the Relationship between Financial Stress and Dietary Risk among Higher Education Students2021 · 28 citations
  3. 3Enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approach.2002 · 491 citations
  4. 4Cardiovascular consequences of financial stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis2023 · 34 citations
  5. 5Systemic racism and undocumented Latino migrant laborers during COVID-19: A narrative review and implications for improving occupational health2022 · 20 citations