PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 28, 2017Journal of Behavioral Addictions374 citationsOpen Access

Family factors in adolescent problematic Internet gaming: A systematic review

View Full Paper
LSLuke A. SchneiderDKDaniel L. KingPDPaul Delfabbro

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background and aims Familial influences are known to affect the likelihood of an adolescent becoming a problem gamer. This systematic review examined some of the key findings in empirical research on family factors related to adolescent problem gaming. Methods A total of 14 studies in the past decade were evaluated. Family-related variables included: (a) parent status (e.g., socioeconomic status and mental health), (b) parent-child relationship (e.g., warmth, conflict, and abuse), (c) parental influence on gaming (e.g., supervision of gaming, modeling, and attitudes toward gaming), and (d) family environment (e.g., household composition). Results The majority of studies have focused on parent-child relationships, reporting that poorer quality relationships are associated with increased severity of problem gaming. The paternal relationship may be protective against problem gaming; therefore, prevention programs should leverage the support of cooperative fathers. Discussion The intergenerational effects of problem gaming require further attention, in light of adult gamers raising their children in a gaming-centric environment. Research has been limited by a reliance on adolescent self-report to understand family dynamics, without gathering corroborating information from parents and other family members. The very high rates of problem gaming (>10%) reported in general population samples raise concerns about the validity of current screening tools. Conclusions Interventions for adolescents may be more effective in some cases if they can address familial influences on problem gaming with the active co-participation of parents, rather than enrolling vulnerable adolescents in individual-based training or temporarily isolating adolescents from the family system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schneider et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a099628a9b588564434440ehttps://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.035
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1e-Youth: balancing between opportunities and risks2012 · 24 citations
  2. 2Family Factors of Internet Addiction and Substance Use Experience in Taiwanese Adolescents2007 · 488 citations
  3. 3Electronic media communication with friends from 2002 to 2006 and links to face-to-face contacts in adolescence: an HBSC study in 31 European and North American countries and regions2009 · 49 citations
  4. 4Factors Associated with Internet Addiction among Adolescents2009 · 534 citations
  5. 5Policy and Prevention Approaches for Disordered and Hazardous Gaming and Internet Use: an International Perspective2017 · 210 citations