PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 6, 20250 citations

Prognostic Impact and Improvement of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Observational Study

View Full Paper
MKMehmet Ruhat KöseEDEmre DemirOGOsman Alperen Gülgör

Key Points

  • Core finding: Baseline severity of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation did not predict adverse outcomes post-TAVI.
  • Key evidence: 68 patients (37.2%) reached the primary endpoint of mortality or hospitalization for heart failure after a median follow-up of 2.26 years.
  • Approach: This retrospective study assessed 183 patients using echocardiographic evaluations before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
  • Significance: Improvement in regurgitation severity post-TAVI was not linked to survival, suggesting that pre-existing regurgitation may not contraindicate the procedure.

Abstract

Abstract Background: The prognostic significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 183 patients who underwent successful TAVI between December 2012 and October 2021 were evaluated. Echocardiographic assessments were performed pre-procedurally, in the early (0–3 months) and late (>3 months) post-procedural periods. Patients were categorized according to MR and TR severity. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. Results: Over a median follow-up of 2.26 years, 68 patients (37.2%) reached the primary endpoint. Event rates were higher in patients with moderate/severe MR (49.2%) and TR (45.1%) compared to those with no/mild regurgitation. However, adjusted analyses did not reveal a significant association between baseline MR or TR severity and the primary outcome. Improvement in MR was observed in 20.3% (early) and 38.8% (late), and in TR in 17.8% (early) and 30.9% (late) follow-up. Nevertheless, improvements in MR or TR severity were not significantly associated with survival. Beta-blocker use and left atrial dilation predicted MR improvement, whereas elevated tricuspid regurgitant velocity was a negative predictor for TR improvement. Conclusion: Baseline MR and TR severity were not independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Although regurgitation severity improved after TAVI, this did not affect survival. Thus, MR or TR should not be considered contraindications for TAVI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Köse et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0f99e6551bb0af8d1664https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7244280/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of mitral regurgitation aetiology on the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation2023 · 37 citations
  2. 2Effect of Tricuspid Regurgitation and the Right Heart on Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2015 · 186 citations
  3. 3Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients2011 · 6,376 citations
  4. 4Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research2021 · 1,285 citations
  5. 5Pulmonary valvotomy with echocardiographic guidance in neonates with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum2014 · 5 citations