PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 30, 2025Indian Journal of Law.0 citations

A comparative analysis of corporate governance and CSR: lessons from India, UK and USA

View Full Paper
MGMonika GuptaASArti Sharma

Key Points

  • Corporate governance and csr show significant differences between India, the UK, and USA, influencing business practices.
  • India mandates certain businesses to invest in social initiatives, enhancing corporate responsibility engagement.
  • The UK promotes voluntary csr projects, while USA prioritizes shareholder value through specific legislative acts.
  • Insights gained aim to improve governance and transparency in corporate operations across different countries.

Abstract

Corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) define business practices, engagement of stakeholders, and regulatory compliance, thereby guiding ethical and sustainable functioning of corporations. “This article compares corporate governance and CSR systems in India, the UK, and the USA by means of an analysis of their regulatory systems, governance structures, and approaches to corporate responsibility. India has formalized CSR and required that certain businesses commit money for social initiatives by way of the Companies Act, 2013. The UK uses a principle-based corporate governance model with a comply or explain approach under ESG standards, therefore encouraging voluntary yet regimented CSR projects. Although CSR is primarily voluntary, molded by institutional investors and corporate activism, the USA promotes shareholder value preservation by means of legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts utilizing its market-driven governance framework. Important differences among these countries in regulatory enforcement, stakeholder orientation, and governance theories are underlined in the study. It also suggests best practices that might enhance corporate governance and CSR performance wherever. By means of research of institutional complementarities and governance-CSR connections, this paper provides insights on encouraging transparency, responsibility, and sustainable corporate operations for lawmakers, businesses, and stakeholders. The findings support the wider general discussion on moral corporate conduct in a contemporary worldwide society.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gupta et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5d5dad7bf08b1eae02f8https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v3.i3.106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corporate governance code comparison for South Asian emerging economies2018 · 11 citations
  2. 2Improving corporate governance with functional diversity on FTSE 350 boards: directors’ perspective2019 · 46 citations
  3. 3Corporate governance practices: global convergence and Indian perspective2018 · 16 citations
  4. 4Corporate governance: mapping the change2018 · 23 citations
  5. 5Multiple banking relationships, agency costs and firm value: evidence from India2019 · 7 citations