Background/Objectives: The RTK-RAS signaling cascade is a central axis in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis, governing cellular proliferation, survival, and therapeutic resistance. Somatic alterations in key pathway genes—including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR—are pivotal to clinical decision-making in precision oncology. However, the integration of these genomic events with clinical and demographic data remains hindered by fragmented resources and a lack of accessible analytical frameworks. To address this challenge, we developed AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS, a domain-specialized conversational artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to enable natural language-based, integrative analysis of RTK-RAS pathway alterations in CRC. Methods: AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS employs a modular architecture combining large language models (LLMs), a natural language-to-code translation engine, and a backend analytics pipeline operating on harmonized multi-dimensional datasets from cBioPortal. Unlike general-purpose AI platforms, this system is purpose-built for real-time exploration of RTK-RAS biology within CRC cohorts. The platform supports mutation frequency profiling, odds ratio testing, survival modeling, and stratified analyses across clinical, genomic, and demographic parameters. Validation included reproduction of known mutation trends and exploratory evaluation of co-alterations, therapy response, and ancestry-specific mutation patterns. Results: AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS enabled rapid, dialogue-driven interrogation of CRC datasets, confirming established patterns and revealing novel associations with translational relevance. Among early-onset CRC (EOCRC) patients, the prevalence of RTK-RAS alterations was significantly lower compared to late-onset disease (67.97% vs. 79.9%; OR = 0.534, p = 0.014), suggesting the involvement of alternative oncogenic drivers. In KRAS-mutant patients receiving Bevacizumab, early-stage disease (Stages I–III) was associated with superior overall survival relative to Stage IV (p = 0.0004). In contrast, BRAF-mutant tumors with microsatellite-stable (MSS) status displayed poorer prognosis despite higher chemotherapy exposure (OR = 7.226, p < 0.001; p = 0.0000). Among EOCRC patients treated with FOLFOX, RTK-RAS alterations were linked to worse outcomes (p = 0.0262). The system also identified ancestry-enriched noncanonical mutations—including CBL, MAPK3, and NF1—with NF1 mutations significantly associated with improved prognosis (p = 1 × 10−5). Conclusions: AI-HOPE-RTK-RAS exemplifies a new class of conversational AI platforms tailored to precision oncology, enabling integrative, real-time analysis of clinically and biologically complex questions. Its ability to uncover both canonical and ancestry-specific patterns in RTK-RAS dysregulation—especially in EOCRC and populations with disproportionate health burdens—underscores its utility in advancing equitable, personalized cancer care. This work demonstrates the translational potential of domain-optimized AI tools to accelerate biomarker discovery, support therapeutic stratification, and democratize access to multi-omic analysis.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.