PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025China and WTO Review0 citations

The Practice of Mediation and Non-litigation in the Dispute Settlement Mechanism between China and the WTO

View Full Paper
JLJia LiuIRIyllyana Che Rosli

Key Points

  • China's approach enhances dispute resolution efficiency, and promotes alternative dispute resolution within the WTO framework.
  • The systematic literature review and thematic analysis utilized various sources, including policy documents and WTO case records.
  • Emphasizing harmony, China aligns its mediation practices with cultural values, impacting the broader WTO dispute settlement process.
  • These findings suggest a diversification of the dispute settlement system within the WTO through effective mediation and non-litigation methods.

Abstract

This study explores the integration of mediation and non-litigation practices in China’s dispute resolution approach within the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework. With the rising importance of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in international trade, China emphasizes mediation and non-litigation to promote harmony and resolve conflicts more efficiently than traditional litigation. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these practices, focusing on their alignment with China’s cultural emphasis on harmony, and their implications for the WTO’s dispute settlement process. Using a qualitative methodology, including a systematic literature review and thematic analysis, the study examines official WTO case records, policy documents, and relevant Chinese legal texts. Findings reveal that China's ADR approach not only enhances dispute resolution efficiency but also contributes to a diversified dispute settlement system within the WTO. These insights offer broader implications for the evolution of ADR in global trade conflict resolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b81254b1d3bfb60ebd37https://doi.org/10.52152/cwr.2025.11.1.05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ADR in International Trade Disputes: Compatibility with WTO and UNCITRAL Frameworks2025
  2. 2Current Status and Improvement Measures of the Civil Mediation System in China2025
  3. 3Cultural Aspects of Trade Dispute Resolution in China1996
  4. 4Study on the Improvement of China's Commercial Mediation System in the Context of the Singapore Convention on Mediation2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Evolution of dispute resolution clauses and mechanisms in the international business contracts of China’s enterprises—a forward look2025