PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025Clinical Cancer Research9 citationsOpen Access

The prognostic impact of early ctDNA kinetics in metastatic pancreatic cancer using the ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (ctDNA-RECIST)

View Full Paper
MSM.M. SteinicheSLSidsel C. LindgaardICInna M. Chen

Key Points

  • Early changes in ctDNA levels indicate overall survival benefits in pancreatic cancer patients under treatment.
  • 71% of patients exhibited positive ctDNA pre-treatment, linking it to overall survival outcomes (HR=1.61).
  • The ctDNA-RECIST criteria evaluates treatment response and correlates with survival during palliative chemotherapy.
  • Validating ctDNA-RECIST in future trials may guide early treatment strategies for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Changes in ctDNA levels during systemic treatment may predict treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but quantitative response criteria are not yet established. This study evaluates our recently proposed ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (ctDNA-RECIST). Material and method: Blood samples were collected pre-treatment, before the second treatment cycle, and at time of the first CT-evaluation from 220 patients with metastatic PDAC receiving first line palliative chemotherapy. Plasma ctDNA levels were measured using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) with HOXA9 methylation assays. ctDNA response was determined according to ctDNA-RECIST and correlated with overall survival (OS). Results: ctDNA was positive pre-treatment in 71% of the patients, and was related with OS (HR=1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.19, p=0.002). Among ctDNA-positive patients, ctDNA Maximal Response (MR) (n=41) and ctDNA Disease Control (DC) (n=107) before the second treatment cycle had longer OS compared with ctDNA Progressive Disease (PD) (n=5) (median OS: MR 11.9 months, DC 7.2 months, PD 3.6 months; p=0.002). In Cox regression ctDNA DC (HR=1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.26, p=0.021) and ctDNA PD (HR=4.50, 1.74-11.6, p=0.002) showed shorter OS compared to ctDNA MR. The same applied to ctDNA response from the second treatment cycle (p0.001) and at time of the first CT-evaluation assessed from treatment start (p0.001) Conclusion: ctDNA-RECIST applied to liquid biopsies holds potential for early evaluation of treatment benefit in patients with metastatic PDAC, offering a novel, minimally invasive method to guide early clinical decision making. Future studies should validate ctDNA-RECIST prospectively, preferably in randomised controlled trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steiniche et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46fbd31b076d99fa698cbhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0758
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Role of HOXA9 in solid tumors: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential2022 · 27 citations
  2. 2Aberrant methylation of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as a promising marker for blood-based diagnosis of colorectal cancer2013 · 185 citations
  3. 3Circulating tumor DNA-guided treatment decision in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Imaging diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a comprehensive review2020 · 157 citations
  5. 5Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes2018 · 2,005 citations