PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2024Translational Andrology and Urology3 citationsOpen Access

A global, propensity-score matched analysis of patients receiving inflatable penile prostheses and the risk of complications, infections, and re-interventions

View Full Paper
HFHalle FossMayo ClinicZPZachary J. PrebayThomas Jefferson UniversityDEDavid EbbottThomas Jefferson University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Over 25,000 men undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement yearly to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). Although various comorbidities are hypothesized risk factors for complications, this remains incompletely understood. Our objective was to utilize multi-institutional data to characterize risk for reintervention, complications, and infections in patients with common suspected risk factors undergoing IPP placement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Foss et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dfdcb6db6435875746cahttps://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-412
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution2003 · 113 citations
  2. 2A Contemporary Analysis of Dual Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes2018 · 21 citations
  3. 3Long-Term Survival of Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Single Surgical Group Experience with 2,384 First-Time Implants Spanning Two Decades2007 · 232 citations
  4. 4Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications2015 · 73 citations
  5. 5Penile implant surgery-managing complications2021 · 36 citations