PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2024ChemPhysChem11 citationsOpen Access

Theoretical Investigation of the Adsorbate and Potential‐Induced Stability of Cu Facets During Electrochemical CO2 and CO Reduction

View Full Paper
HYHenry YuLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNGNitish GovindarajanLawrence Livermore National LaboratorySWStephen E. WeitznerLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The activity and product selectivity of electrocatalysts for reactions like the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) are intimately dependent on the catalyst's structure and composition. While engineering catalytic surfaces can improve performance, discovering the key sets of rational design principles remains challenging due to limitations in modeling catalyst stability under operating conditions. Herein, we perform first‐principles density functional calculations adopting implicit solvation methods with potential control to study the influence of adsorbates and applied potential on the stability of different facets of model Cu electrocatalysts. Using coverage dependencies extracted from microkinetic models, we describe an approach for calculating potential and adsorbate‐dependent contributions to surface energies under reaction conditions, where Wulff constructions are used to understand the morphological evolution of Cu electrocatalysts under CO 2 RR conditions. We identify that CO*, a key reaction intermediate, exhibits higher kinetically and thermodynamically accessible coverages on (100) relative to (111) facets, which can translate into an increased relative stabilization of the (100) facet during CO 2 RR. Our results support the known tendency for increased (111) faceting of Cu nanoparticles under more reducing conditions and that the relative increase in (100) faceting observed under CO 2 RR conditions is likely attributed to differences in CO* coverage between these facets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77577b6db6435876ea2afhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202300959
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper