PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 9, 20250 citationsOpen Access

The theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions

View Full Paper
ÉSÉ. B. Sonin

Key Points

  • Current-phase relation derived for SNS junctions highlights temperature independence at $T$ exceeding Andreev level spacing,
  • Analysis reveals dependence on junction length $L$, providing $1/L^4$ decrease with growing $L$.
  • Developed model includes phase gradients in superconducting layers, addressing charge conservation law issues.
  • Implications for junctions with non-equal Fermi velocities suggest different behaviors than previously predicted.

Abstract

The paper presents the theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions with equal Fermi velocities and effective masses in all layers. The theory takes into account phase gradients in superconducting layers commonly ignored in the past. At T=0 the current-phase relation was derived for any thickness L of the normal layer in the model of the steplike pairing potential model analytically. The obtained current-phase relation is essentially different from that in theory neglecting phase gradients, especially in the limit L 0 (short junction). The analysis resolves the problem with the charge conservation law in the steplike pairing potential model. The current-phase relation at temperatures exceeding the energy spacing between Andreev levels but less than the critical temperature was also calculated numerically. The current at these temperatures is temperature independent and decreases with growing L as 1/L⁴. The previous theory predicted the current exponentially decreasing with growing T and L. Possible implications of the analysis for planar junctions with non-equal Fermi velocities and for non-planar junctions (narrow normal bridge between two bulk superconductors) are also discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

É. B. Sonin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/690fdcdaf60c54d04ea38085https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.02967
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Andreev reflection, Andreev states, and long ballistic SNS junction2024
  2. 2Andreev reflection, Andreev states, and long ballistic SNS junction2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Anomalous Josephson diode effect in superconducting multilayers2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Current phase relation in a planar graphene Josephson junction with spin–orbit coupling2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Self-consistent evaluation of proximity and inverse proximity effects with pair-breaking in diffusive SN junctions2024