PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Can an Anti-de Sitter Vacuum in the Dark Energy Sector Explain JWST High-Redshift Galaxy and Reionization Observations?

ACAnirban ChakrabortyTCTirthankar Roy ChoudhuryASAnjan A. Sen

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess whether an anti-de Sitter vacuum in the dark energy sector can account for the abundance of high-redshift galaxies.
  • Used a semi-analytical model coupling galaxy evolution with reionization.
  • Examined the growth of structures under an alternative cosmological background.
  • Tested the model against high-redshift observations and cosmological constraints.
  • The model tailored to high-z UV luminosity functions shows promise but conflicts with cosmological constraints.
  • Alternative models meeting cosmological requirements offered only modest increases in structure formation.
  • Models did not adequately explain the observed galaxy abundance at z > 10.

Abstract

Abstract The unexpectedly large abundance of UV-bright galaxies at z 10 discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope poses a significant challenge to the standard ΛCDM cosmology. This work tests whether modifying the cosmological background, and thereby the growth of structures, can resolve this tension without invoking significant evolution in the astrophysical properties of early galaxies. We investigate an alternative framework featuring an anti-de Sitter vacuum in the dark energy sector, which naturally arises in quantum gravity models like string theory and can enhance early structure formation. Using a self-consistent semi-analytical model that couples galaxy evolution with reionization, we confront this scenario with a wide range of observations. We show that while a model tailored to fit the high-z UV luminosity functions (UVLFs) appears promising, it is in strong tension with cosmological constraints from the CMB and other low-redshift probes. Conversely, models within this framework that satisfy these constraints provide only a modest boost to structure formation and fail to reproduce the observed galaxy abundances at z 10. Although these models remain consistent with the cosmic reionization history, we find that this class of cosmological modifications is insufficient on its own to explain the galaxy excess. Our study underscores the importance of holistic testing for any beyond-ΛCDM proposal; apparent success in one observational regime does not guarantee overall viability. By demonstrating the limitations of a purely cosmological solution, our results strengthen the case that evolving astrophysical properties are a necessary ingredient for solving the challenge of early galaxy formation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chakraborty et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebf3485a1ff6a930165bchttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag269
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Early Galaxies and Early Dark Energy: A Unified Solution to the Hubble Tension and Puzzles of Massive Bright Galaxies revealed by JWST2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Early galaxies and early dark energy: a unified solution to the hubble tension and puzzles of massive bright galaxies revealed by <i>JWST</i>2024 · 46 citations
  3. 3The Cosmic Rush Hour: Rapid Formation of Bright, Massive, Disky, Star-Forming Galaxies as Signatures of Early-Universe Physics2026
  4. 4Modelling the star-formation activity and ionizing properties of high-redshift galaxies2024 · 15 citations
  5. 5Modelling the star-formation activity and ionizing properties of high-redshift galaxies2024 · 5 citations