Intranasal drug delivery represents a transformative “backdoor” to the brain, bypassing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) that bars 98% of small molecules and nearly all large biopharmaceuticals. By harnessing the unique anatomy of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, therapeutics can travel directly from the nasal cavity to the central nervous system, achieving therapeutic concentrations without the systemic toxicity of traditional routes. Clinical and preclinical evidence highlight the efficacy of intranasal insulin (INI) in treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and delirium, with studies showing significant improvements in cognitive scores and reduced hospital stays (7.9 vs. 12.9 days; p = 0.014). Additionally, other peptides can be administered intranasally like oxytocin, neuropeptide Y, and novel metabolic modulators for neuroprotection and affective disorders (AD, autism, Down syndrome). Despite these promises, critical translational gaps remain, including anatomical differences between macrosmatic rodents and microsmatic humans, and significant sex-based dosing dimorphism. The ease of intranasal administration introduces profound bioethical dilemmas regarding neuroenhancement, authenticity, and informed consent in vulnerable populations. The current literature concludes that realizing the full potential of nose-to-brain (N2B) therapy requires a commitment to precision medicine, utilizing specialized delivery devices and objective biomarkers to ensure safe and equitable clinical application.
Damian et al. (2026) studied this question.