PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Journal of democracy2,235 citations

On Democratic Backsliding

View Full Paper
NBNancy Bermeo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Democratic backsliding (meaning the state-led debilitation or elimination of the political institutions sustaining an existing democracy) has changed dramatically since the Cold War. Open-ended coups d’état, executive coups, and blatant election-day vote fraud are declining while promissory coups, executive aggrandizement and strategic electoral manipulation and harassment are increasing. Contemporary forms of backsliding are especially vexing because they are legitimated by the very institutions democracy promoters prioritize but, overall, backsliding today reflects democracy’s advance and not its retreat. The current mix of backsliding is more easily reversible than the past mix and successor dictatorships are shorter-lived and less authoritarian.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nancy Bermeo (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d89f07a5ecc596b5d17f11https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Beyond free and fair : monitoring elections and building democracy2004 · 147 citations
  2. 2Turkey's AKP: A Model "Muslim-Democratic" Party?2005 · 92 citations
  3. 3Democracy’s Future: Do Economists Know Best?1995 · 16 citations
  4. 4Turkey Under the AKP: Are Rights and Liberties Safe?2012 · 26 citations
  5. 5Defending Democratic Norms: International Actors and the Politics of Electoral Misconduct2013 · 73 citations