PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2002Applied Measurement in Education956 citations

A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment

View Full Paper
THThomas M. HaladynaSDSteven M. DowningMRMichael C. Rodriguez

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract A taxonomy of 31 multiple-choice item-writing guidelines was validated through a logical process that included two sources of evidence: the consensus achieved from reviewing what was found in 27 textbooks on educational testing and the results of 27 research studies and reviews published since 1990. This taxonomy is mainly intended for classroom assessment. Because textbooks have potential to educate teachers and future teachers, textbook writers are encouraged to consider these findings in future editions of their textbooks. This taxonomy may also have usefulness for developing test items for large-scale assessments. Finally, research on multiple-choice item writing is discussed both from substantive and methodological viewpoints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haladyna et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9dff70d540cafc5837d8dhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1503_5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Educational measurement, 3rd ed.1989 · 2,859 citations
  2. 2Assessment in the Classroom1999 · 17 citations
  3. 3Multiple‐choice testing in anatomy1992 · 40 citations
  4. 4Classroom applications of educational measurement1994 · 137 citations
  5. 5Must All Stems Be Green? A Study of Two Guidelines for Writing Multiple Choice Stems.1996 · 3 citations