PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Diagnostics1 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Age and Sex on Normalized Automated DECT-Derived Pulmonary Iodine Concentration

View Full Paper
TSThomas SchömigASAndrii SabovDZDavid Zopfs

Key Points

  • The study aims to automate iodine quantification in lung tissue and examine how age and sex affect iodine distribution.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort analysis with 112 adults (53% female) undergoing DECT scans.
  • Utilized automatic lung volumetry alongside iodine mapping to assess lung lobes.
  • Calculated pulmonary iodine perfusion ratios (PIPRs) normalized to iodine concentration in major blood vessels.
  • Mean lung volume significantly differed between sexes: females at 3.9 L and males at 5.2 L.
  • Iodine concentration varied by sex: females had 0.87 mg/mL compared to 0.69 mg/mL in males.
  • PIPRs showed no significant differences when normalized against the iodine level in the main pulmonary artery.
  • PIPRs decreased with age, indicating a potential age effect on iodine distribution.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dual-energy CT (DECT) enables iodine quantification as a snapshot perfusion indicator. Understanding pulmonary iodine distribution in lung-healthy individuals is crucial for clinical applications. This study aimed to automate iodine quantification and assess demographic effects in a lung-healthy reference cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 112 adults (53% female, mean age 60.3 ± 16.6 years) who underwent repeated portal venous phase chest DECT on a spectral detector dual-layer scanner between 2016 and 2019 at an academic medical center. Patients had dermato-oncological diseases but no visible thoracic tumors. Automatic lung volumetry was merged with reconstructed iodine maps to assess volume and mean iodine concentrations of each lung lobe. Pulmonary iodine perfusion ratios (PIPRs) were calculated by normalizing the pulmonary iodine density against iodine concentration in the portal vein and the main pulmonary artery (mPA). Results: Mean lung volume (f: 3.9 L vs. m: 5.2 L) and iodine concentration (f: 0.87 mg/mL vs. m: 0.69 mg/mL) differed between ages. However, no difference was observed when comparing PIPRs after normalizing against the iodine level in the mPA. PIPRmPA were consistent across two timepoints (r = 0.88) and decreased with increasing age (≤50 years: 0.18 vs. ≥70 years: 0.15). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that automated pulmonary iodine quantification is feasible. Normalized pulmonary iodine concentration is a more reliable and effective method for evaluating iodine distribution. Our study also highlights the need to account for sex and age variations in future research and clinical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schömig et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db375f4fe01fead37c553fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper