PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Lara D. Veeken1 citationsOpen Access

Lung transplant outcomes in myositis, systemic sclerosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter retrospective analysis

View Full Paper
ACAngela ChangNSNavid SalehAYAlec Yu

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the clinical characteristics and post-lung transplant outcomes of patients with myositis, systemic sclerosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
  • Retrospective analysis of lung transplant patients with IIM, SSc, and IPF across two Canadian centers.
  • Evaluation of clinical characteristics, including the incidence of pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dysmotility.
  • Comparison of post-transplant survival rates and complications among the different patient groups.
  • IIM patients showed a higher need for pre-transplant ICU admission and emergency transplantation.
  • No significant differences in 1-year survival rates were found among IIM, SSc, and IPF patients.
  • Median survival was 2.8 years for IIM, 2.5 years for SSc, and 3.6 years for IPF, with no observed autoimmune disease recurrence.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To describe clinical characteristics and post-lung transplant outcomes of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM),systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods We retrospectively analyzed interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with IIM (n = 22), SSc (n = 32), and IPF (n = 64) who underwent lung transplantation (2012-2024) at two Canadian centers, Vancouver and Montréal. Results Among IIM patients, 41% was clinically amyopathic at presentation, and 45% had anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis (DM), all with rapid progressive (RP)-ILD, 32% anti-synthetase syndrome, 14% overlap myositis, and 9% other DM. In SSc, 88% had pulmonary hypertension (PH) (31% severe) and 78% had esophageal dysmotility. IIM patients required more frequent pre-transplant ICU admission and emergency transplantation. Post-transplant, IIM patients had longer ICU/hospital stays. There were no significant differences in 1-year survival, survival at last follow-up (median: 2.8 years for IIM, 2.5 years for SSc, and 3.6 years for IPF), incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, or malignancy. Subgroup analyses of IIM (stratified by transplant urgency, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, and amyopathy) and SSc (stratified by severe PH, esophageal dysmotility, and transplant urgency) showed no significant differences in long-term survival. No autoimmune disease recurrence was observed. Conclusion Despite their underlying autoimmune diseases, post-transplant survival outcomes of selected IIM and SSc patients did not differ significantly from those with IPF. IIM patients with RP-ILD necessitating emergency transplantation and ECMO support exhibited survival similar to those without such complications. However, their more complex pre- and post-transplant courses emphasize the necessity for individualized lung transplant strategies and a multidisciplinary management approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cefb5cdc762e9d857e35https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag200
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper