PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

COSMOLOGY OF TIME: a critical–propositional reading of the article Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid, by Everton Behenck, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • The study examines the relationship between Behenck’s Cosmology of Time and the Theory of Objectivity, exploring its phenomenological implications.
  • Conceptual analysis of Behenck’s work on cosmology and time.
  • Comparison with the modal ontology from the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Literature review on foundational themes in cosmology, philosophy of physics, and ontology.
  • Behenck’s proposal reinterprets dark energy and matter as temporal roles in an informational cycle.
  • The Cosmology of Time does not meet the strong modal requirements of the Theory of Objectivity.
  • The frameworks show potential for productive dialogue, indicating areas of divergence in foundational concepts.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Everton Behenck’s preprint Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva, the study investigates the extent to which Behenck’s Cosmology of Time may be read as a phenomenological and observationally oriented framework that resonates with, or diverges from, the modal ontology of TO. The paper argues that Behenck’s proposal is especially relevant because it reinterprets dark energy, baryonic matter, and dark matter as temporal roles within an irreversible informational cycle, thereby opening a productive dialogue with core TO themes such as objective memory, irreversibility, relational constitution, phenomenic elements, inducing effects, and the composition of the present by prior elements. At the same time, the article shows that the Cosmology of Time does not yet satisfy the stronger modal demands of the Theory of Objectivity, since it does not derive its categories from necessary axioms, nor does it solve the problem of the absolute genesis of the universe from a foundational logical-ontological standpoint. The article is structured as a full scientific study with abstract, complete sections, bibliography, and a final appendix in the style of TO. It situates the debate within the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology and empirical bridges, and a broader dialogue with modern physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science. The result is not a mere critique, but a constructive effort to clarify how Behenck’s framework may function as a derived physical-phenomenological layer, while TO remains the deeper modal architecture of objective reality. Authors’ note: this analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Cosmology of Time; Everton Behenck; dark energy; dark matter; baryonic matter; gravitational memory; wave function collapse; decoherence; Landauer principle; modal ontology; cosmology; phenomenic elements; inducing effects; cosmogonic theorem; philosophy of physics; foundations of cosmology; objective reality; irreversibility; informational cosmology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473ff010ef96374d8fbc3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19634377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DARK ENERGY AS FUTURE, QUANTUM COLLAPSE AS PRESENT, AND DARK MATTER AS GRAVITATIONAL MEMORY OF THE PAST: a critical-propositional analysis of Everton Behenck’s Cosmology of Time in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity2026
  2. 2Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More's review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)2026
  3. 3THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL TIME: A critical–propositional analysis of ChronoShell Framework (v3.2): Multidimensional Time as the Foundation of Physical Reality, by S. Mahlyankin, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity2026
  4. 4TEMPORAL DECOUPLING AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Timeless Sea Cosmology and Accumulative Emergent Time Theory in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO2026
  5. 5WHITTAKER, DARK ENERGY, AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Mark Titleman's article in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO2026