PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Withdrawal, Consent, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction: The Duterte Case

View Full Paper
MMMorris Kiwinda Mbondenyi

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the complexities of ICC jurisdiction concerning withdrawal and consent, specifically in the Duterte case.
  • Analysis of treaty design
  • Comparison of institutional legitimacy
  • Evaluation of criminal responsibility versus adjudicative jurisdiction
  • Identified limitations in ICC jurisdiction linked to states' withdrawal
  • Highlighted the significance of consent in treaty obligations
  • Clarified the distinction between types of jurisdiction in international law

Abstract

A Policy Brief on Treaty Design, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Distinction Between Criminal Responsibility and Adjudicative Jurisdiction

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morris Kiwinda Mbondenyi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713b4cb99343efc98d1f8https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19655257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sovereignty, Selective Justice, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction in the Duterte Case2026
  2. 2Sovereignty, Selective Justice, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction in the Duterte Case2026
  3. 3The Duterte Case and the Risk of Jurisdictional Overreach2026
  4. 4The Duterte Case and the Risk of Jurisdictional Overreach2026
  5. 5An Evaluation of the “Legacy Jurisdiction” of the International Criminal Court: The Philippines Investigation2025 · 1 citations