急性心筋梗塞後の心原性ショックにおける経皮的機械的循環補助と大動脈内バルーンポンプの比較

Ouweneelら（Mon,）がこの問題を研究しました。

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f46fff58d1a5fd6677ec4a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1. Experience from a randomized controlled trial with Impella 2.5 versus IABP in STEMI patients with cardiogenic pre-shock.· 2015 · 80 citations
2. The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry· 2013 · 384 citations
3. National Trends in the Utilization of Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support· 2014 · 469 citations
4. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (WMA) - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects