PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 24, 2025PLOS Digital Health6 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging: A systematic review

View Full Paper
MQMuhammad Ibtsaam QadirJBJackson A BarilMYMichele Yip-Schneider

Key Points

  • Artificial intelligence shows promise for improving diagnostic accuracy in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging.
  • Of 1041 publications, 25 studies analyzed trends in AI application for IPMN, revealing increased research focus.
  • Most studies (44%) utilized CT imaging, with 36% focused on differential diagnosis and 40% on risk stratification.
  • Collaboration across multiple centers and diverse datasets is essential for advancing AI's clinical translation in IPMN management.

Abstract

Based on the Fukuoka and Kyoto international consensus guidelines, the current clinical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) largely depends on imaging features. While these criteria are highly sensitive in detecting high-risk IPMN, they lack specificity, resulting in surgical overtreatment. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based medical image analysis has the potential to augment the clinical management of IPMNs by improving diagnostic accuracy. Based on a systematic review of the academic literature on AI in IPMN imaging, 1041 publications were identified of which 25 published studies were included in the analysis. The studies were stratified based on prediction target, underlying data type and imaging modality, patient cohort size, and stage of clinical translation and were subsequently analyzed to identify trends and gaps in the field. Research on AI in IPMN imaging has been increasing in recent years. The majority of studies utilized CT imaging to train computational models. Most studies presented computational models developed on single-center datasets (n = 11,44%) and included less than 250 patients (n = 18,72%). Methodologically, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithms were most commonly used. Thematically, most studies reported models augmenting differential diagnosis (n = 9,36%) or risk stratification (n = 10,40%) rather than IPMN detection (n = 5,20%) or IPMN segmentation (n = 2,8%). This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of AI in IPMN imaging. Computational models have potential to enhance the accurate and precise stratification of patients with IPMN. Multicenter collaboration and datasets comprising various modalities are necessary to fully utilize this potential, alongside concerted efforts towards clinical translation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qadir et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0621e6551bb0af8cdedchttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000920
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper