PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025PLoS ONE1 citationsOpen Access

AI-driven analysis of diabetes risk determinants in U.S. adults: Exploring disease prevalence and health factors

View Full Paper
DMDawid MajcherekACAdam CiesielskiPSPaweł Sobczak

Key Points

  • The Extra Trees Classifier achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with over 90% and an AUC of 0.99.
  • Analysis identified BMI, age, income, and general health status as major predictors of diabetes risk.
  • Datasets from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System included 253,680 adult respondents with diverse health behaviors.
  • Tree-based ensemble machine learning methods may enhance public health tools for targeted diabetes risk assessment.

Abstract

Diabetes remains a major public health concern in the United States, with a complex interplay of behavioral, demographic, and clinical risk factors. This study aims to identify the three best-performing machine learning models for diabetes risk prediction and to visualize the most influential predictors affecting diabetes likelihood. By leveraging a large, representative dataset, the study contributes to evidence-based strategies for targeted prevention. Data were obtained from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a nationally representative, population-based survey collecting information on health behaviors, chronic conditions, and preventive care. The analytical sample included 253, 680 adult respondents and over twenty features encompassing sociodemographic variables (e. g. , age, sex, race, income, education), health behaviors (e. g. , smoking, physical activity, diet), and outcomes (e. g. , BMI, hypertension, diabetes status). Eighteen machine learning models were trained and evaluated, including AdaBoost, Extra Trees Classifier, C5. 0 Decision Tree, and CatBoost. Models were assessed using predictive accuracy and AUC scores. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was used to interpret the top model and examine how changes in key features influence diabetes risk. Among the evaluated models, the Extra Trees Classifier achieved the highest predictive accuracy (>90%) and an AUC of 0. 99. AdaBoost and CatBoost also demonstrated strong performance. Feature importance analysis identified BMI, age, general health status, income, physical health days, and education as the top predictors. A nonlinear association between income and diabetes risk was observed, with the highest prevalence in individuals earning 20, 000-25, 000. Risk was also elevated in individuals aged 65-69 and those reporting poor general health. Hypertension showed a strong positive correlation with diabetes risk. Machine learning models, particularly tree-based ensemble methods, offer robust tools for diabetes risk prediction. These findings support their integration into public health analytics for personalized risk assessment and data-driven prevention strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Majcherek et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189ca9b7b07f3a0612ebfhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328655
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Visualizing Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence: Localizing Model Feature Impacts2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2WITHDRAWN: Applications of interpretable machine learning models in the prediction of 5-year risk of death in patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Risk factors associated with physical and mental distress in people who report a COPD diagnosis: latent class analysis of 2016 behavioral risk factor surveillance system data2019 · 25 citations
  4. 4Higher educational attainment but not higher income is protective for cardiovascular risk in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users2013 · 23 citations
  5. 5Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions2021 · 5,387 citations