PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment0 citations

Open Science: A New Paradigm for the Research Lifecycle

View Full Paper
YIYannis Ioannidis

Key Points

  • Open Science increases researchers' collaboration and accountability, fostering a more transparent research environment.
  • The approach redefines publications to encompass data, software, and other artifacts, moving beyond traditional papers.
  • Key dimensions of Open Science are debated to highlight their benefits and potential drawbacks for the research community.
  • The transition to Open Science affects all stages of the research lifecycle, necessitating a shift in mindset for the scientific community.

Abstract

Open Science is a fundamentally new philosophy about the goals, methods, and business models of scientific research and scholarly communication. The motivation for research remains the same, as Open Science continues to honor scientific curiosity and societal or industrial challenges as its primary drivers. Open Science methodologies, however, continue to spotlight individual researchers for their achievements, but also promote common good. They are motivated by the following needs: increase researchers' collaboration, accountability, and transparency; democratize researchers' and the general public's access to knowledge around the world; reconceive of what constitutes a publication to include data, software, and other artifacts beyond traditional papers; elevate the importance of research results' reproducibility; and increase society's trust to the scientific community. Open Science affects every single stage of the research lifecycle significantly. Naturally, the scientific community and the extended ecosystem around it (university administrators, research funders, journal publishers, conference organizers, ...) need ample time to move towards the new mentality. In preparation for this change, this panel exposes the key dimensions of Open Science to the database community, highlights the various choices offered in each dimension, and debates their advantages and disadvantages and the way forward.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yannis Ioannidis (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b2931b076d99fa5dadchttps://doi.org/10.14778/3750601.3760518
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Revisiting Open Science Through a Global Health Lens: Critical Reflections2025
  2. 2Open Science, reproducibible research, and the citation of articles, code and data alike2026
  3. 3Introduction to Open Science: Where are we heading? 4 Prehrambeno-tehnološki fakultet Osijek2026
  4. 4How far along are we on the journey towards Open Science?2026
  5. 5Open Science: Access, Control, Responsibility2026