PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction45 citationsOpen Access

Customer Churn Prediction: A Systematic Review of Recent Advances, Trends, and Challenges in Machine Learning and Deep Learning

View Full Paper
MIMehdi ImaniMJMajid JoudakiABAli Beikmohammadi

Key Points

  • Machine learning and deep learning methods enhance churn prediction, addressing key business revenue issues.
  • Dominant ML techniques include ensemble methods like XGBoost and LightGBM, while DL methods involve LSTM and CNN.
  • Challenges in churn prediction include class imbalance, limited interpretability, and the need for business-focused metrics.
  • Despite advancements, gaps in real-world application and evaluation metrics for profitability remain noteworthy.

Abstract

Background: Customer churn significantly impacts business revenues. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods are increasingly adopted to predict churn, yet a systematic synthesis of recent advancements is lacking. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates ML and DL approaches for churn prediction, identifying trends, challenges, and research gaps from 2020 to 2024. Data Sources: Six databases (Springer, IEEE, Elsevier, MDPI, ACM, Wiley) were searched via Lens.org for studies published between January 2020 and December 2024. Study Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed original studies applying ML/DL techniques for churn prediction were included. Reviews, preprints, and non-peer-reviewed works were excluded. Methods: Screening followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A two-phase strategy identified 240 studies for bibliometric analysis and 61 for detailed qualitative synthesis. Results: Ensemble methods (e.g., XGBoost, LightGBM) remain dominant in ML, while DL approaches (e.g., LSTM, CNN) are increasingly applied to complex data. Challenges include class imbalance, interpretability, concept drift, and limited use of profit-oriented metrics. Explainable AI and adaptive learning show potential but limited real-world adoption. Limitations: No formal risk of bias or certainty assessments were conducted. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. Conclusions: ML and DL methods have matured as key tools for churn prediction, yet gaps remain in interpretability, real-world deployment, and business-aligned evaluation. Systematic Review Registration: Registered retrospectively in OSF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Imani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d475a031b076d99fa6dd36https://doi.org/10.3390/make7030105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper