PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2024JACC. Cardiovascular imaging36 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

View Full Paper
RARik AdrichemTHThijmen W. HokkenSBSjoerd Bouwmeester

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and low transvalvular flow, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is recommended to determine AS severity, whereas the degree of aortic valve calcification (AVC) supposedly correlates with AS severity according to current European and American guidelines. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between AVC and AS severity as determined using echocardiography and DSE in patients with aortic valve area <1 cm2 and peak aortic valve velocity <4.0 m/s. All patients underwent DSE to determine AS severity and multislice computed tomography to quantify AVC. Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic value of AVC for AS severity grading as determined using echocardiography and DSE in men and women. A total of 214 patients were included. Median age was 78 years (25th-75th percentile: 71-84 years) and 25% were women. Left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced (<50%) in 197 (92.1%) patients. Severe AS was diagnosed in 106 patients (49.5%). Moderate AS was diagnosed in 108 patients (50.5%; in 77 based on resting transthoracic echocardiography, in 31 confirmed using DSE). AVC score was high (≥2,000 for men or ≥1,200 for women) in 47 (44.3%) patients with severe AS and in 47 (43.5%) patients with moderate AS. AVC sensitivity was 44.3%, specificity was 56.5%, and positive and negative predictive values for severe AS were 50.0% and 50.8%, respectively. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.508 for men and 0.524 for women. Multi-slice computed tomography–derived AVC scores showed poor discrimination between grades of AS severity using DSE and cannot replace DSE in the diagnostic work-up of low-gradient severe AS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adrichem et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68e6fb6db6435876152dfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.03.014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Aortic Valve Calcification Density Measured by MDCT in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity2024 · 16 citations
  2. 2Multimodality approach to low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: sex-specific ct calcium thresholds validated by dobutamine stress echocardiography2026
  3. 3Grading of Aortic Valve Calcification Severity and Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis2024 · 24 citations
  4. 4Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification in Nonsevere Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Significance of Aortic Valve Calcification in Patients With Low‐Gradient Low‐Flow Aortic Stenosis2013 · 35 citations