PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Hydrology and earth system sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Modelling runoff in a glacierized catchment: the role of forcing product and spatial model resolution

View Full Paper
AEAlexandra von der EschMHMatthias HussMTMarit Van Tiel

Key Points

  • Runoff modeling in glacierized catchments reveals that high-resolution precipitation is critical for accurate simulations.
  • Evaluating spatial model resolution from 25 to 3000 m shows significant impact on glacier mass balance results.
  • Analysis utilizing the Glacier Evolution Runoff Model highlights the significance of both meteorological inputs and calibration strategies.
  • Findings suggest that improved calibration methods can enhance model reliability despite challenges of limited observational data.

Abstract

Abstract. Glaciers are vital water resources, particularly in alpine regions, sustaining ecosystems and communities during dry summer months. Accurate glacio-hydrological models are essential for understanding water availability under climate change. However, these models face numerous challenges, including limited observations for model forcing, calibration and validation, as well as computational constraints at fine spatial resolutions. This study assesses the reliability of glacio-hydrological simulations in a glacierized catchment (39.4 km2) in Switzerland using the Glacier Evolution Runoff Model (GERM) at daily temporal resolution. Two experiments investigate how simulated glacier mass balance and runoff are affected by (1) varying meteorological forcing products, from point data to coarse grids, and (2) spatial model resolution, from 25 to 3000 m. We find that the forcing from different precipitation data sets has the largest effect on model results. In this study, model resolutions coarser than 1000 m fail to capture essential glaciological and topographic details, affecting the accuracy of small and medium-sized glaciers. Single-data calibration on geodetic glacier ice volume change can accurately reproduce annual glacier mass balance but lead to seasonal biases, driven by underestimating winter precipitation and compensatory parameter adjustments. Calibrating the model on multi-data, including geodetic glacier ice volume change and runoff, improves seasonal accuracy but is limited by temporally constant precipitation adjustments that cannot account for temporal forcing biases. These findings highlight the trade-offs between computational efficiency and model reliability, emphasizing the need for high-resolution forcing data, particularly precipitation amount and seasonal variability, and careful calibration strategies to capture glacio-hydrological processes accurately. While the results are derived for a single, well-instrumented catchment, they hint at broader implications for modelling glacierized catchments under data-scarce conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Esch et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9da91d383f2b2a37a489https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6761-2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing Multi‐Source Precipitation Estimates in Nepal: A Benchmark for Sub‐Seasonal Model Assessment2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change to mass change2013 · 688 citations
  3. 3A distributed temperature-index ice- and snowmelt model including potential direct solar radiation1999 · 486 citations
  4. 4On the interpolation of precipitation data over complex terrain2008 · 31 citations
  5. 5The Effect of Glaciers on Streamflow Variations1985 · 294 citations