PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 11, 2025JAMA Oncology3 citations

Cognitive Impairment and Chemoendocrine vs Endocrine Therapy in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women

View Full Paper
IKIrene KangJFJamie K. ForschmiedtMLMichelle Marie Loch

Key Points

  • To compare cognitive impairment between breast cancer treatments in pre- and postmenopausal women.
  • Secondary analysis of the RxPONDER trial
  • Comparison of patient-reported cognitive function using PCF questionnaire
  • Participants randomly assigned to chemoendocrine therapy or endocrine therapy
  • CET associated with greater cognitive impairment than ET in both pre- and postmenopausal participants
  • PCF scores decreased over time in CET group and did not return to baseline
  • Longitudinal mean PCF score difference was significant for both groups

Abstract

Importance Breast cancer treatment is associated with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). However, the association of endocrine therapy (ET) vs chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (CET) with CRCI is poorly understood. Objective To compare patient-reported CRCI between women with breast cancer treated with ET vs CET and to consider whether menopausal status may be associated. Design, Settings, and Participants This was a prespecified secondary analysis of RxPONDER (SWOG S1007), a multinational phase 3 randomized clinical trial of more than 5000 women with hormone receptor−positive ERBB2 -negative (formerly HER2 -negative) breast cancer with 1 to 3 involved lymph nodes and Oncotype DX (21-gene recurrence score) of 25 or less. Participants were enrolled from February 2011 to September 2017, with results first reported in December 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to CET or ET, with ongoing follow-up. This secondary analysis assessed cognitive function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Perceived Cognitive Function Concerns (PCF) questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, and 36 months. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2025. Intervention Random assignment to CET or ET. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean PCF standardized (T) scores by menopausal status over time using generalized estimating equations analysis for continuous outcomes. Results Of the 568 patients who completed the baseline questionnaire and were included in the analysis, 139 (24%) were premenopausal (median range age, 47.8 28.0-56.3 years) and 429 (76%) were postmenopausal (median range age, 62.3 37.3-87.6 years). Among the 274 (48%) who received CET and the 294 (52%) who received ET alone, CET was determined to have a greater negative association with patient-reported CRCI in both the pre- and postmenopausal participants during the 36-month follow-up. In the ET alone group, PCF scores for premenopausal participants decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months (53.53, 51.51, and 51.72, respectively) but recovered to baseline (54.36) at 36 months. For postmenopausal participants, mean PCF scores were essentially stable (51.72, 51.13, 51.11, and 51.70, respectively); however, in the CET group, PCF scores for both pre- and postmenopausal participants decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months (premenopausal, 52.84, 49.27, 48.04; postmenopausal, 50.65, 48.39, 47.13, respectively) and did not return to baseline at 36 months (premenopausal, 49.25; postmenopausal, 48.44). The difference in longitudinal mean PCF scores over time between CET and ET groups was −3.02 (95% CI, −5.33 to −0.72; P = .01) for premenopausal and −2.37 (95% CI, −3.92 to −0.82; P = .003) for postmenopausal participants. Conclusions and Relevance This secondary analysis of the RxPONDER found that CET had a greater negative association with patient-reported CRCI compared to ET alone in both pre- and postmenopausal participants over a 36-month follow-up period. Interventions to prevent or treat CRCI are needed to improve the long-term quality of life of these patients treated with chemotherapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01272037

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b172d562116f28f74d2https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.5220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and cognitive impairment in long-term breast cancer survivors.2026
  2. 2Assessment of Cancer‐Related Cognitive Impairments Across Anti‐Cancer Therapies in a Predominantly Breast Cancer Cohort2026
  3. 3Abstract PO5-12-05: A Retrospective Study of the Rate of Cognitive Impairment and Influencing Factors during Postoperative Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer2024
  4. 4Genomic risk distribution, adjuvant chemotherapy trends, and survival outcomes in women with pT1, grade 1-2, ER/PR-positive, LVI-negative breast cancer2026
  5. 5Overall survival (OS) in premenopausal ER+/PR+, HER2− breast cancer (BC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± chemotherapy (CT): A National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.2026