PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2020Royal Society Open Science1,512 citationsOpen Access

Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world

View Full Paper
JRJon RoozenbeekCSClaudia R. SchneiderSDSarah Dryhurst

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Misinformation about COVID-19 is a major threat to public health. Using five national samples from the UK ( n = 1050 and n = 1150), Ireland ( n = 700), the USA ( n = 700), Spain ( n = 700) and Mexico ( n = 700), we examine predictors of belief in the most common statements about the virus that contain misinformation. We also investigate the prevalence of belief in COVID-19 misinformation across different countries and the role of belief in such misinformation in predicting relevant health behaviours. We find that while public belief in misinformation about COVID-19 is not particularly common, a substantial proportion views this type of misinformation as highly reliable in each country surveyed. In addition, a small group of participants find common factual information about the virus highly unreliable. We also find that increased susceptibility to misinformation negatively affects people's self-reported compliance with public health guidance about COVID-19, as well as people's willingness to get vaccinated against the virus and to recommend the vaccine to vulnerable friends and family. Across all countries surveyed, we find that higher trust in scientists and having higher numeracy skills were associated with lower susceptibility to coronavirus-related misinformation. Taken together, these results demonstrate a clear link between susceptibility to misinformation and both vaccine hesitancy and a reduced likelihood to comply with health guidance measures, and suggest that interventions which aim to improve critical thinking and trust in science may be a promising avenue for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roozenbeek et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d593413292fa9df0b4f75https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Epitope finding in 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): The first world report2020 · 98 citations
  2. 2Analytic-Thinking Predicts Hoax Beliefs and Helping Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic2020 · 14 citations
  3. 3The relationship between conspiracy beliefs and compliance with public health guidance with regard to COVID-192020 · 52 citations
  4. 4How Right-Leaning Media Coverage of COVID-19 Facilitated the Spread of Misinformation in the Early Stages of the Pandemic in the U.S.2020 · 457 citations
  5. 5Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation2019 · 722 citations