PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Psychonomic Bulletin & Review0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the involvement of long-term memory in working memory

View Full Paper
JPJulie PougeonCBClément BelletierPBPierre Barrouillet

Key Points

  • The study aims to test whether the memory residual observed in working memory tasks is retrieved from long-term memory.
  • Conducted two experiments comparing memory residuals in immediate recall and after a 1-minute counting delay.
  • Utilized complex span tasks with a concurrent parity judgment task to increase attention demands.
  • Measured changes in memory residuals under conditions of concurrent articulation.
  • Immediate memory residuals were reduced by delay but two-thirds remained retrievable after the delay.
  • Findings indicate memory residual relies significantly on long-term memory when attention demand is high.
  • Forgetting rates during the complex span task were notably higher than during the delay, challenging existing working memory theories.

Abstract

Abstract Complex span tasks are working memory (WM) tasks in which participants maintain series of items (e.g., letters) for further serial recall while performing a concurrent task (e.g., parity judgement on digits). It has been shown that even pushing the demand of this concurrent task at its individual limits strongly reduces, but does not totally abolish, memory performance. A small memory residual of about one item remains. The present study aimed at testing the hypothesis that this residual is retrieved from long-term memory (LTM). For this purpose, two experiments compared the size of memory residual either through immediate recall or after a 1-min delay filled with a backward counting task. If it is retrieved from LTM, a substantial part of this residual should still be accessible after the delay. Although this delay reduced the immediate memory residual, about two-thirds of this residual was still retrievable when the complex span task was performed under concurrent articulation. These findings confirmed that when processing almost entirely captures attention, memory residual mainly relies on LTM. However, the fact that forgetting rate during the complex span task was far larger than during the subsequent delay weakens WM theories suggesting that memory items are offloaded in activated LTM when attention is switched away. We suggest that our findings are more compatible with the short-term transient storage hypothesized by the synaptic theory of WM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pougeon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f59c8125b09b0d1f2cfhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02774-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper