PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Cancer0 citations

Assessing the utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM‐5 (PC‐PTSD‐5) as a screening tool among caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors

View Full Paper
AAAllison J. ApplebaumCMCole ManschotEKEric Kuhn

Key Points

  • Evaluate the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 as a brief screening tool for PTSD in caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors.
  • Conducted a randomized clinical trial involving 106 caregivers.
  • Participants completed both the PC-PTSD-5 and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).
  • Determined optimal cut scores and item performance using item response theory analyses.
  • 33% of caregivers screened positive for probable DSM-5 PTSD using PCL-5.
  • PC-PTSD-5 showed acceptable internal consistency and strong correlation with PCL-5 scores.
  • A cutoff score of 3 provided optimal sensitivity for PTSD screening.

Abstract

Abstract Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is an intensive and invasive procedure used in cancer treatment that depends heavily on the involvement of caregivers and places them at high risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. These symptoms are frequently overlooked in oncology and general health care settings. The suitability and utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM ‐ 5 (PC‐PTSD‐5) within cancer caregivers remains uncertain. This study sought to evaluate its performance as a brief (five‐item) case finding screening alternative to the longer (20‐item) PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) in caregivers of survivors who received an HCT 1–5 years ago. Method A total of 106 caregivers completed the PC‐PTSD‐5 and PCL‐5 during recruitment for a randomized clinical trial. Optimal cut scores for identifying probable PTSD and item performance were determined using indices correcting for chance and item response theory analyses. Results Of the caregivers evaluated, 33% screened as positive for probable DSM‐5 PTSD using the PCL‐5. The PC‐PTSD‐5 exhibited acceptable internal consistency and significant associations with PCL‐5 scores (total, r = 0.79; items r range 0.60–0.69). A cutoff score of 3 provided optimal sensitivity for screening (κSe = 1). Item response theory analyses indicated the need for the complete PC‐PTSD‐5 items to provide the greatest information across varying levels of PTSD. Conclusion Although not an instrument validation study, these findings provide preliminary support for using the PC‐PTSD‐5 as a succinct, effective screening tool among cancer caregivers in a clinical context.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Applebaum et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828b90fc35cd7a88487cchttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70285
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancer and their partners2014 · 70 citations
  2. 2Caregiving Burden, Stress, and Health Effects Among Family Caregivers of Adult Cancer Patients2012 · 630 citations
  3. 3Local Dependence Indexes for Item Pairs Using Item Response Theory1997 · 703 citations
  4. 4A meta‐analysis of prevalence rates and moderating factors for cancer‐related post‐traumatic stress disorder2014 · 283 citations
  5. 5Stress and coping during COVID-19 pandemic: Result of an online survey2020 · 286 citations