PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Indian Journal of Community Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond the Pad: Barriers and Facilitators to Menstrual Cup Use Among Medical Undergraduates in South India

View Full Paper
AJAnkeeta Menona JacobSPShambhavi Priya

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify barriers and facilitators influencing menstrual cup use among female medical undergraduates in South India.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study with 270 consenting female medical undergraduates.
  • Utilized a pre-validated questionnaire delivered via Google Forms.
  • Analyzed associations between menstrual cup use, age at menarche, and menstrual regularity using Chi-square tests.
  • Only 7% of participants reported current menstrual cup use, while 9.6% reported ever using one.
  • Common barriers included difficulty with insertion or removal for 55.3% of non-users.
  • Key facilitators for users included the absence of rashes (61.5%) and the low cost and reusability of cups (57.7%).

Abstract

Abstract Understanding menstrual hygiene preferences among medical undergraduates may provide insights into adoption of sustainable choices such as menstrual cups in India. A cross-sectional study (January–June 2023) assessed barriers and facilitators to menstrual cup use among consenting female medical undergraduates ( n =270) in a private medical college in coastal Karnataka using a pre-validated questionnaire administered through Google Forms with electronic informed consent. Associations between cup use and age at menarche and menstrual regularity were analysed using Chi-square tests in Jamovi v2.7.6. Current menstrual cup use was 19 (7.0%), while 26 (9.6%) reported ever-use of Menstrual cups. Key facilitators among ever-users were the absence of rashes or allergies 16 (61.5%) and preference due to low cost and reusability 15 (57.7%). The most common barriers among non-users were difficulty with insertion or removal 145 (55.3%) and a preference for other hassle-free menstrual absorbents 114 (50.9%). Despite low uptake, cup users reported high acceptability related to comfort and affordability, whereas non-users perceived cups as difficult to insert, remove, and manage. Addressing practical concerns may improve menstrual cup adoption among medical undergraduates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jacob et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d7a482488d673cd34fbhttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_869_24
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Study of adaptability and efficacy of menstrual cup in managing menstrual health and hygiene2017 · 82 citations
  2. 2Acceptability and feasibility of using vaginal menstrual cups among schoolgirls in rural Nepal: a qualitative pilot study2021 · 104 citations
  3. 3Usage of menstrual cups among the doctors of reproductive age group in a tertiary care centre in Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India- An observational study2023 · 9 citations
  4. 4A descriptive cross-sectional study on perceived barriers and facilitators regarding the use of menstrual cups among medical students in a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry2023 · 2 citations
  5. 5Experience and adaptability of menstrual cup as a menstrual hygiene management method among its users in Kerala2022 · 26 citations