PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Internal Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Progress in the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: From Pathogenic Insights to Biologics

RIRyotaro IkeguchiYSYuko ShimizuKTKenichi Todo

Key Points

  • This review aims to highlight advancements in biologic treatments for NMOSD and compare them to conventional therapies.
  • Examine recent therapies for NMOSD, focusing on biologics and their mechanisms of action.
  • Analyze the efficacy of these treatments in preventing relapses compared to conventional therapies.
  • Discuss individualization of treatment based on drug profiles and patient needs.
  • Biologics demonstrate superior relapse prevention compared to glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants.
  • New therapies such as eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab are highlighted as significant advancements in treatment.
  • Individualized treatment plans are recommended to optimize patient outcomes, minimizing adverse effects.

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that affects the optic nerve and spinal cord. Attacks often result in severe neurological disabilities, which make relapse prevention critical. Conventional therapies rely on glucocorticoids (GCs) and immunosuppressants; however, relapses may still occur and long-term administration can cause adverse effects. Following the discovery of anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies, NMOSD has been recognized as an independent "astrocytopathy" distinct from multiple sclerosis, and the development of molecular targeted therapies has advanced rapidly. Recently, biologics such as complement inhibitors (eculizumab and ravulizumab), IL-6 receptor inhibitors (satralizumab), and B-cell-depleting agents (inebilizumab and rituximab) have been successively introduced. These biologics demonstrate better relapse prevention than conventional treatments and also contribute to the tapering of GC. Drugs have different mechanisms of action, administration, and side effect profiles; therefore, treatment selection should be individualized. This review summarizes the recent progress in this field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ikeguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe28895ddcd3a253e64d8https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.6772-25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper