PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Structural Robustness of Isotropic S3 Vacua in Einstein–Cartan Minisuperspace via Chiral Equilibrium and Weyl Stability

View Full Paper
MMuacca

Key Points

  • This research aims to classify effective potential phases of isotropic S3 vacua in the context of Einstein-Cartan gravity.
  • Utilized a Euclidean-signature minisuperspace framework.
  • Classified effective potentials into distinct phases based on local minima and barriers.
  • Conducted a numerical scan to identify critical conditions related to well formation and barrier dynamics.
  • The effective potential's phase structure varies systematically with topology.
  • Certain contributions from the Nieh-Yan term show relative insensitivity to topology.
  • Specific geometrical conditions selectively influence other contributions.

Abstract

We study Einstein--Cartan (EC) gravity supplemented with the Nieh-Yan (NY) term in a Euclidean-signature minisuperspace framework, and classify the resulting effective potential into distinct ``phases. '' Based on the presence or absence of local minima and barriers in the effective potential, we define three types: (I) metastable well with barrier, (II) barrier-free rolling, and (III) unstable/boundary-attached configurations. While the Nieh-Yan density (a 4-form) can be written as an exact derivative, it is geometrically defined through the coframe and torsion. To facilitate meaningful comparison, we evaluate topology dependence under a unified ansatz. We adopt spatial sections that admit left-invariant coframes, enabling systematic description within a common minisuperspace framework. As concrete test beds, we consider: (i) S³, (ii) T³, and (iii) Nil³. For the NY term, we focus on the complete form (FULL) as the primary object, while also examining TT (torsion-torsion component only) and REE (the remaining component) as diagnostic comparisons to disentangle the contributions within FULL. Our investigation addresses two main questions: (1) How does the phase (Type I/II/III) of the effective potential depend on topology? (2) Can we identify, through numerical scanning, critical conditions corresponding to well formation/disappearance and barrier collapse, and organize their geometric dependence? Our scanning results suggest the following: The phase structure of the effective potential varies systematically with topology. Within the NY term, some contributions exhibit relative insensitivity to topology, while others appear selectively depending on geometric conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muacca (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e75f1e85e5c73bf2347https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18815499
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Topology-Dependent Phase Classification of Effective Potentials in Einstein–Cartan + Nieh–Yan Minisuperspace2026
  2. 2Reduced-Sector $\chi$-Universality in Lorentzian EC+NY Minisuperspace: Topology-Robust Admissibility, P-Channel Diagnostics, and Reduced Vacuum Orbits2026
  3. 3Unified Geometric Landau EFT of Homogeneous $S^3 \times S^1$ Minisuperspace in Einstein-Cartan + Nieh-Yan Theory2026
  4. 4Homogeneous Three–Topology Comparison and Mode Dictionary in Einstein–Cartan + Nieh–Yan Theory:Geometric Structure of EC–Weyl Coupling2026
  5. 5Lorentzian Einstein-Cartan Minisuperspace with Nieh-Yan Torsion: Hamiltonian Branches, Pontryagin Diagnostics, and Weyl-Source Obstructions2026