PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Participatory Educational Research0 citationsOpen Access

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Instructional Materials Development

ANAsep NuryadinKKKarlimah KarlimahMNMuhammad Rizki Nugraha

Key Points

  • The aim is to systematically review how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is used for developing instructional materials in education.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Retrieved data from the Scopus database.
  • Categorized themes based on the types of instructional materials developed using GenAI.
  • 71% of studies focused on higher education, while 29% were in K-12 settings.
  • Findings reveal that GenAI enhances the efficiency and diversity of instructional materials.
  • Identified challenges include output quality, human readiness, and ethical concerns.

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in developing instructional materials across formal educational contexts. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database using a structured search strategy following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 71% conducted in higher education and 29% in K-12. Thematic categorization shows that instructional materials developed with GenAI are dominated by textual and written materials, while the most frequently used tools are large language models (LLMs)/text generation such as ChatGPT and Copilot. The findings indicate that GenAI offers strong potential to accelerate the development and diversify the formats of instructional materials, with reported benefits including time, workload, and cost efficiency, support for educators, personalization and adaptability, improved quality and range of materials, as well as positive impacts on learning processes and outcomes. However, key challenges remain, particularly related to output quality, human readiness, technical-operational constraints, ethical issues, as well as negative impacts on learning processes and outcomes. Despite several limitations, the study highlights the importance of strengthening educators’ AI literacy and skills, institutional policy support, and further empirical research regarding the use of GenAI in education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nuryadin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af963170916d39fea4e26bhttps://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.27.13.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper