PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Blood Cancer Journal4 citationsOpen Access

Linvoseltamab versus real-world International Myeloma Working Group standard-of-care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

View Full Paper
SKShaji KumarSJSundar JagannathKWKatja C. Weisel

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of linvoseltamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma compared to real-world standard of care.
  • Conducted a Phase 1/2 trial with linvoseltamab for RRMM patients
  • Compared with an external control arm of real-world data
  • Utilized independent data review and central evaluation committees
  • Applied inverse probability of treatment weighting for cohort balancing
  • Linvoseltamab showed a higher objective response rate with a weighted odds ratio of 3.0
  • Median progression-free survival was significantly longer, with a weighted hazard ratio of 0.33
  • Time to next treatment was improved, with a weighted hazard ratio of 0.34
  • Overall survival also favored linvoseltamab, demonstrated by a weighted hazard ratio of 0.72

Abstract

LINKER-MM1 (NCT03761108) is a Phase 1/2 study of linvoseltamab, a human BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who are triple-class exposed (TCE) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy (3L+), or triple-class refractory (TCR). To contextualize efficacy data from LINKER-MM1, the Phase 2 linvoseltamab 200 mg cohort (N = 105) was compared with an international external control arm (ECA) comprising 203 patients from participating International Myeloma Working Group sites who met LINKER-MM1 eligibility criteria based on chart reviews. The ECA reflected real-world standard-of-care (RW SOC). An independent data review committee assessed data relevance, quality, and cohort comparability, while a separate independent central review committee evaluated response data. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between the linvoseltamab arm and the ECA. Linvoseltamab had a higher objective response rate (weighted odds ratio 3.0 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-4.1) and longer median progression-free survival (weighted hazard ratio wHR 0.33 95% CI: 0.28-0.40), time to next treatment (wHR 0.34 95% CI: 0.29-0.44), and overall survival (wHR 0.72 95% CI: 0.58-0.98) than RW SOC. These findings highlight linvoseltamab's potential as an effective treatment for 3L+ and TCE/TCR RRMM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c770418bbfbc51511e07c7https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01466-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper