PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2011New England Journal of Medicine6,376 citationsOpen Access

Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

View Full Paper
CSCraig R. SmithGeneral Cardiology
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. LeonInterventional / Structural Cardiology
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. MackInterventional / Structural Cardiology

Structured PICO

Does transcatheter aortic-valve replacement improve survival at 1 year in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to surgical aortic-valve replacement?

P
Population
High-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement
C
Comparator
Surgical aortic-valve replacement
O
Outcome
Survival at 1 yearhard clinical

Transcatheter and surgical aortic-valve replacement provide similar 1-year survival in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Abstract

In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter and surgical procedures for aortic-valve replacement were associated with similar rates of survival at 1 year, although there were important differences in periprocedural risks. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT00530894.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56f8a75589c71d767d99fhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1103510
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper